Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Compliance > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-03-2011, 08:00 AM
DStack818 DStack818 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
DStack818 is on a distinguished road
Question Fee Schedule Question

I am looking for documentation to support a discussion on fee schedules. I have been notified that it is illegal to have mutliple billing fee schedules per Medicare. I have went to the CMS website and there is a million hits on fee schedules! Thanks!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2011, 09:34 AM
btadlock1's Avatar
btadlock1 btadlock1 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,505
btadlock1 will become famous soon enough
Default

What exactly do you mean by multiple fee schedules? You have to have different fee schedules for each payer - they're all based on your individual contracts. Medicare should only have one fee schedule for your area. Commercial fee schedules have to have higher allowables than Medicare (you can't charge a private insurance less than the government), but that's the only rule that I'm aware of.
__________________
Brandi Tadlock, CPC, CPC-P, CPMA, CPCO
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2011, 09:47 AM
DStack818 DStack818 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
DStack818 is on a distinguished road
Default

I know it sounds a little out there...I have been told that an office can only have 1 billing fee schedule because Medicare says so, it is illegal and Medicare will fine you for it.

I agree that they are based on individual contracts. Medicare does only have one fee schedule for our area. I am talking more on billing fee schedules and not expected fee schedules.

Does this help? I went to the CMS website this morning and searched for over an hour.

Thank you for assisting in this matter!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2011, 03:15 PM
LeslieTapia LeslieTapia is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 18
LeslieTapia is on a distinguished road
Question No more consultation codes 99244 or 99254?

We are not longer using consultation codes right? 99241-99245 or 99251 to 99255?
thanks,
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2011, 05:34 PM
btadlock1's Avatar
btadlock1 btadlock1 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,505
btadlock1 will become famous soon enough
Default

If they're not a Medicare contractor, then they don't know what they're talking about. We have dozens of fee schedules - one for the Blues, one for Cigna/Great West, one for Teamchoice, One for UHC (actually, 2 for UHC becaue of one of our providers), and so on...Medicare and Medicaid are the only ones with set fee schedules across the board. Commercial contracts are negotiated annually, and vary from practice to practice.

Now, if this is an issue of a supplemental policy not having the same fee schedule as the primary payer, then they may be technically correct. You have to honor both, if they don't coordinate benefits. That means, if the primary has a high allowable and happens to pay more than the secondary allows, you have to write off the balance as a contractual adjustment. Let me give a couple of examples:

For these examples, let's say you billed a 99213 at $100 to primary payer A, and secondary payer B.

#1 Payer A allows $95 and pays $70, leaving a $25 copay. Payer B only allows $65, and denies payment, because another payer has paid the full allowed amount. You have to write off the $25.

#2 Payer A allows $80, and applies it to deductible. Payer B allows $60 and pays $40. You may only bill a $20 copay.

#3 Payer A allows $75 and pays $50. Payer B allows $95 and pays $75. You call to verify that they paid correctly as secondary, and if they did, you refund the patient $50.

I'm looking for some actual regulations, but the only one I can think of regarding fee schedules is the one I mentioned earlier, which I think is a provision of OBRA. I'll let you know when I find it, though.

Leslie,
I don't know if the consult codes have been deleted for 2011, because I haven't seen the new CPT, but if they're still in there, they're still valid codes. Medicare no longer recognizes consult codes, though - but that began in 2010.
__________________
Brandi Tadlock, CPC, CPC-P, CPMA, CPCO
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2011, 10:03 AM
DStack818 DStack818 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
DStack818 is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you for your time. I agree completely with you. It is trying to prove and justify the reasoning to upper management.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2011, 05:10 PM
btadlock1's Avatar
btadlock1 btadlock1 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,505
btadlock1 will become famous soon enough
Default

That's always the hardest part...

CMS's website is a tangled mess, but I believe if you search terms like "COB" and "anti-kickback statute", you may find what you're looking for. (You'll have to refine those searches, but it's a place to start) The OIG's website also has all of the regulations, but it's not any more user-friendly, and there are lots of actual pieces of legislation to sort through. (Get familiar with your lawyer-lingo).

Good luck, and if I can do anything else to help, let me know!
__________________
Brandi Tadlock, CPC, CPC-P, CPMA, CPCO
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2011, 10:04 AM
FTessaBartels FTessaBartels is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 4,436
FTessaBartels will become famous soon enough
Default One fee schedule

We have ONE fee schedule. But we make contractual adjustments based on the MANY contracts we have with various payers.

So, for example, let's say that our Fee for CPT 12345 is $425.00. That is what we bill to every payer. Per Payer 1's contract with us, P1 pays $300.00 for CPT 12345. Per Payer 2's contract, they pay $400.00. Payer 3's contract only allows $85.00. Etc ... as long as we have a contract in place to accept that payment, we write off the balance as contractual adjustment. Please NOTE This is an EXAMPLE with a fake CPT and fake pricing, just for illustration purposes.

Hope that helps.

F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2011, 11:40 AM
CVelez's Avatar
CVelez CVelez is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 85
CVelez is on a distinguished road
Default

I agee with F Tessa - you have one fee schedule and adjust according to your contracts, but everyone is charge the same $ amount.

Charla, CPC, CASCC
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-09-2011, 11:10 AM
jimbo1231 jimbo1231 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 292
jimbo1231 is on a distinguished road
Default Fee Schedule

My experience in the billing industry has been that generally one fee schedule is used for all payers as well as self pay patients. I don't believe it is illegal to have multiple schedules. But you have to tread carefully with multiple schedules. And administrativally multiple schedules can be a challenge . The trick with fee scehedules is that the fees are appropriatte but high enough that the practice is maximizing reimbursement.
Anything approaching 100% reimbursement from non contracted payers is usually an indication that the fee schedule should be updated.
Jim S
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:14 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC