Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > E/M
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-27-2011, 02:25 PM
kevbshields kevbshields is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,092
kevbshields will become famous soon enough
Default Acceptable levels of variance in E/M coding

I have been asked to find literature or an industry authority that in some way addresses the acceptable level of variance between an auditor's findings and the billed service level.

Although I can come up with many articles that discuss how subjective E/M is, or how payers develop their own interpretations, I'm coming up frustrated without any specific guidance.

Even if it is just a suggestion or allusion, I'll take it. Personally, I believe it is entirely up to who audits the case, the employment atmosphere and the payer or review service. However, it has to be addressed for the project I'm working on.

Any input will be helpful and thanks!
__________________
Kevin B. Shields, RHIT, CPCO, CCS, CPC, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-P, CPC-I
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2011, 03:39 PM
btadlock1's Avatar
btadlock1 btadlock1 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,505
btadlock1 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevbshields View Post
I have been asked to find literature or an industry authority that in some way addresses the acceptable level of variance between an auditor's findings and the billed service level.

Although I can come up with many articles that discuss how subjective E/M is, or how payers develop their own interpretations, I'm coming up frustrated without any specific guidance.

Even if it is just a suggestion or allusion, I'll take it. Personally, I believe it is entirely up to who audits the case, the employment atmosphere and the payer or review service. However, it has to be addressed for the project I'm working on.

Any input will be helpful and thanks!
I'm using this: http://www.ttuhsc.edu/billingcomplia...rov_042111.pdf as a model to develop our audit/education process. I think the point-system is awesome.
__________________
Brandi Tadlock, CPC, CPC-P, CPMA, CPCO
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-29-2011, 08:25 AM
kevbshields kevbshields is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,092
kevbshields will become famous soon enough
Default

Thanks for the help. I'll have a look at what you've suggested.

Let's just say for this project I'm looking at it from the payer's perspective. Would there be a specific methodology to apply in that case?
__________________
Kevin B. Shields, RHIT, CPCO, CCS, CPC, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-P, CPC-I
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2011, 09:16 AM
btadlock1's Avatar
btadlock1 btadlock1 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,505
btadlock1 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevbshields View Post
Thanks for the help. I'll have a look at what you've suggested.

Let's just say for this project I'm looking at it from the payer's perspective. Would there be a specific methodology to apply in that case?
I think you could keep basically the same point system for determining what actions are appropriate, since that's based on how detrimental the various mistakes are to the providers' efforts to be compliant - you could just modify the action plan, to maybe conduct a larger scale audit, select providers for pre-payment reviews, or just send them a letter advising them of your findings, depending on how bad they really screwed up, in relation to how much it affected your company. (For example, providers that made minor mistakes that have little or no bearing on the payment might just get an FYI, while one that consistently upcoded in the sample audit, might have to undergo a full-scale retrospective review for a code identified as having a high error rate.) You could even build in steps to impose future restrictions on the provider's conditions of participation, which could work to your advantage during contract negotiations.

Whatever you do, though, make sure that your policies are incorporated into you provider contracts, so you won't be in breach, with any actions taken. Good luck!
__________________
Brandi Tadlock, CPC, CPC-P, CPMA, CPCO
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-29-2011, 11:11 AM
j.berkshire j.berkshire is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 237
j.berkshire is on a distinguished road
Default

Have you reviewed the information on the CERT page on CMS's website?
__________________
Jenny Berkshire, CPC, CEMC, CGIC
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2011, 01:02 PM
kevbshields kevbshields is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,092
kevbshields will become famous soon enough
Default

I'm familiar with CERTS, but perhaps I'm unaware of exactly which information on CERTS you're referring to.

In visiting the CMS website today, I see information on Improper Payment Acts, various error rate reports and so on. Are you suggesting that there is specific language in CERTS that defines how CMS determines acceptable variance in E/M from payer versus auditor? That would be a great start for me.
__________________
Kevin B. Shields, RHIT, CPCO, CCS, CPC, CCS-P, CPC-H, CPC-P, CPC-I
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC