Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Pathology & Clinical Laboratory
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-04-2012, 09:43 AM
Kdailey Kdailey is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seacoast-Dover NH
Posts: 30
Kdailey is on a distinguished road
Question Is 079.4 a stand alone code?

The note under 079 in the tabular section states "This category is provided to be used as an additional code to identify the viral agent in diseases classifiable elsewhere. This category will also be used to classify virus infection of unspecified nature or site."

To me, this means that 079.X codes are not stand-alone codes and are only secondary to another ICD-9 code.

If I have a requisition from a doctor (signed by the doctor) that lists the patient's diagnosis as V72.31, 079.4 or V76.2, 079.4....Is this correct coding? Or should there be another code inbetween the V72.31 and the 079.4 to identify the "disease classifiable elsewhere"?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-04-2012, 10:21 AM
hewitt's Avatar
hewitt hewitt is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 390
hewitt is on a distinguished road
Default

If you do not mind reading a little, the document below will help you get the additional diagnoses needed, if the patient presented or has a family history of other possible complications:
http://apps.ngsmedicare.com/lcd/LCD_L29508.htm
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-04-2012, 10:48 AM
Kdailey Kdailey is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seacoast-Dover NH
Posts: 30
Kdailey is on a distinguished road
Question

Thank you for the link. It was helpful for background information and the codes that are medically necessary for HPV testing per Medicare.

Are you stating that 079.4 would need 795.00, 795.01, or 795.02 before it?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-04-2012, 10:55 AM
hewitt's Avatar
hewitt hewitt is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 390
hewitt is on a distinguished road
Default

We can only code what's documented in the medical record. If any of these are not, you must not. The document also details why the testing is done, what complications may come along with the diagnosis.... Does the medical record document any of these?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2012, 11:31 AM
Kdailey Kdailey is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seacoast-Dover NH
Posts: 30
Kdailey is on a distinguished road
Default

I work for a 3rd party billing company and do not have access to the medical record. I only have the diagnosis the doctor wrote on the requisition, which is V72.31, 079.4.

Based on the note in the tabular under 079, I am questioning if V72.31, 079.4 is considered correct coding. If yes, I can bill the claim. If no, I need to tell management that the client needs to be informed that 079.4 is not a stand-alone code and should only be secondary to the disease classified elsewhere. Then we can ask the client to review the patient's medical record. The client does not wish to be bothered with questions or requests for additional information. Therefore, I am trying to determine if it is considered correct coding to bill with V72.31, 079.4 or not.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04-2012, 11:41 AM
hewitt's Avatar
hewitt hewitt is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Manhattan, NY
Posts: 390
hewitt is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you for the detail. You can code V72.31 and 079.4 together, and as you've noted is not necessarily "good" coding. You do not want to include another diagnosis that the patient may carry around with them for the rest of their lives if you are not absolutely certain it is true. I apologize, but I am not comfortable telling you to use an additional ICD-9 without knowing what was documented.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC