Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Cardiovascular Thoracic

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-06-2012, 07:58 AM
DORINDAV DORINDAV is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 41
DORINDAV is on a distinguished road
Question L vats w/lll wege bx and partial decort

A VATS was performed using 3 2cm incisions. The lower was completed just above the diaphragm, and the two upper were completed under direct vision. In the chest there were extensive adhesions between the lower lobe and diaphragm extendng up the posterior chest wall. We performed a decortication freeing the lower lobe up to the fissure. At this point, the nodule was identified and palpated. We resected it with an Echelon thorascopic stapling device which was inserted and placed across the base of the nodule leaving a 1 cm margin. The specimen was sent to the lab for histologic evaluation and frozen section came back consistent with granuloma.....

Dx: LLL pumonary nodule: 793.11 (pre-op and post-op)
I was going to use 32608-LT with 32651(partial decort) but I can't use the 32608 with the 32651 in the CCI edits. I want to bill for the wedge as well but didn't want to use the 32666-therapeutic wedge since the path came back as granuloma.

Any thoughts would be helpful.

Thanks,
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-12-2012, 07:24 AM
jewlz0879 jewlz0879 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 713
jewlz0879 is on a distinguished road
Default

All six diagnostic codes (32601-32609) are bundled with the surgical thoracoscopies (32650-32674). Diagnostic thoracoscopies should not be billed if a surgical thoracoscopy is performed during the same session, unless the diagnostic procedure resulted in the decision to perform surgery, then you can attach modifier 58.

On the other hand, multiple surgical thoracoscopies are not bundled with each other. If two separate techniques are performed at different sites, both may be billed with modifier 59.

The decortication makes it surgical however, the diagnostic procedure 32608 did not result in reason for surgery. It seems like the nodule was removed but maybe I'm interpreting that wrong. Based on that, I would bill:

32666
32651-59

HTH
__________________
Julie Graham, BA, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-14-2012, 06:47 AM
DORINDAV DORINDAV is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 41
DORINDAV is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for the info...so regardless of the path on the wedge, if the nodule is removed, it is considered a therapeutic wedge, right?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:29 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2011, AAPCAd Management plugin by RedTyger