Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Plastic Surgery

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-20-2010, 09:33 AM
jmgrier jmgrier is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 31
jmgrier is on a distinguished road
Default Amputation of supernumery digits

I am coding a proc note for the bilateral amputation of supernumerary digits of a one day old infant. This one has me stumped. The note states that these two digits were removed with a "suture technique" and dressings were applied.

I am looking at both 26910 & 26989. In this case, I don't think that 26910 truly applies.

Any thoughts or suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Thanks )
__________________
Jill M. Grier CPC
2010 President-elect
Professional Coders of Tidewater
Chesapeake, VA
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-20-2010, 02:33 PM
gost's Avatar
gost gost is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 234
gost is on a distinguished road
Default

This most likely falls under 11200. That is the code CPT points to for reconstruction of polydactyly when no bone is involved. 11200 includes ligature technique.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2010, 07:10 PM
preserene preserene is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 993
preserene is on a distinguished road
Default

Jill M. Grier ,
I really want to know the result which was real correct one with your case on billing. I know the coders desk may come out with different explanation
Because when the doctor documented AMPUTATION of th SN digits bilateral, why would it not merit to be coded with 26951, if all the phalanyces or even a single phalanyx or joint of the digit primary or secondary involved and on the top of it ofcourse, there would have been a nuerectomy invollved too; there was just a direct closure too without mentioning about reconstruction. (This i am thinking because there was not a mention about "only soft tissues" excised.)
In my experience I have seen bilateral more of with bony tissue atleast one phalynx than just soft tissue alone. What was there in your case?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:49 AM
FTessaBartels FTessaBartels is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 4,336
FTessaBartels is on a distinguished road
Default 11200

Gost's advice is correct. CPT 11200 is the code to use in this case.

Preserene - From your post, I am not sure if you are offering advice or asking a question.
We cannot code what is NOT documented. If the physician performed 26951 the documentation MUST specify that bone was cut.

F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-07-2012, 10:25 AM
jacrook22@aol.com jacrook22@aol.com is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbus
Posts: 2
jacrook22@aol.com is on a distinguished road
Default

If two extra digits consisting of soft tissue only were removed from infant's right foot, would the code be 11200 (removal of up to 15 skin tags) or 11200-RT AND 11200-59?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-07-2012, 03:05 PM
FTessaBartels FTessaBartels is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 4,336
FTessaBartels is on a distinguished road
Default 11200

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacrook22@aol.com View Post
If two extra digits consisting of soft tissue only were removed from infant's right foot, would the code be 11200 (removal of up to 15 skin tags) or 11200-RT AND 11200-59?
I believe you question answers itself
CPT 11200 - removal of up to 15 skin tags.

So if you are removing two you're covered with one code.

Hope that helps.

F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2011, AAPCAd Management plugin by RedTyger