Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Gastroenterology
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-08-2007, 10:06 AM
codermcdreamy's Avatar
codermcdreamy codermcdreamy is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 74
codermcdreamy is on a distinguished road
Default colonoscopies

Someone comes in for a rountine exam, has a family hx of colon polyps and nothing is found except for unspecified internal hemorrhoids and diverticulosis. Will the dx codes for the hemorroids and diverticulosis change the value of the screening? And how important is it to code those two along with the V76.51 and the V18.51?
__________________
codermcdreamy CPC, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2007, 02:58 PM
scorrado scorrado is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 293
scorrado is on a distinguished road
Default

Proper coding would be the reason for the procedure coded first and then any findings. Now, that said - every office and insurances have their own policies on this so you might want to check with the insurances that you encounter the most and see what they prefer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-13-2007, 07:24 AM
mbort's Avatar
mbort mbort is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ENGLEWOOD/DENVER
Posts: 2,333
mbort is on a distinguished road
Default

Are you coding for the physician or facility? If its an ASC, the rules are different according to the ICD9 book.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-13-2007, 10:34 AM
mstenochs mstenochs is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bay City
Posts: 44
mstenochs is on a distinguished road
Default

I dont believe that the findings would change the value of the procedure but in my experience its actually rather important to code the findings as well as the screening codes. In the scenario that you presented, the diverticulosis would mean that the patient would be, by certain insurance carrier standards, eligible to have a colonoscopy done at a more frequent interval than someone with no symptoms or history.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-17-2007, 01:02 PM
cconroycpch cconroycpch is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Palm Beach
Posts: 69
cconroycpch is on a distinguished road
Default

You should code for the screening as primary and the others as secondary and additional diagnosis. For an ASC, it will not change the value.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-06-2007, 06:07 PM
sunchips sunchips is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 16
sunchips is on a distinguished road
Red face

Hi!

In my experience, I have not been able to use the screening code. I am in Michigan and I found that the carriers here do not like it. The best advice that I can give is to check your LCD for Colonoscopies/Sigmoidoscopies for Medicare especially. It should have all of the ICD-9 codes that you can use listed on there. I am not saying don't use the screening, rather just make sure it appropriate for your area. Also, beware of using hemmorhoid codes too! This Dx code is excluded from the LCD list for Michigan. We can't use it at all. Medicare won't pay and (of course) all the other payers follow. However, definitely use your diverticulosis codes, polyps, etc., if the doc documents them. I hope this helps...

Felicia Copeny, CPC-A
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-06-2008, 10:29 PM
sundaey's Avatar
sundaey sundaey is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 64
sundaey is on a distinguished road
Default

was any of this discussed during the patient's first visit? If the patient has diverticulosis/diverticulitis, they usually have signs/symptoms (bouts of diarrhea, abdominal pain, etc.) if so, then it is no longer a screening colonoscopy, but a diagnostic one. As for the hemorrhoids, I have been using those codes for my scopes and they have been getting paid. However, if they just have a screening scope, and the doctor said that the pt had a normal colon, then I would use the screening code as well as the family hx code. But, from my understanding, once you have a disease present, you code the disease b/c that is what your doctor is going to be follwing up on in the office.
hope that this helps!
__________________
Malama pono,

Sundae, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-08-2008, 10:31 PM
codegirl0422's Avatar
codegirl0422 codegirl0422 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 257
codegirl0422 is on a distinguished road
Default

You may want to check with your Medicare carrier, because CMS published their guidelines in Oct or Nov 07 explaining, clarifying how it should be done. Per MC, if it started as a screening, the primary diagnosis should be screening. This is due to patients are not suppose to pay a deductible on screening colonoscopies.


Quote:
Originally Posted by fcopeny View Post
Hi!

In my experience, I have not been able to use the screening code. I am in Michigan and I found that the carriers here do not like it. The best advice that I can give is to check your LCD for Colonoscopies/Sigmoidoscopies for Medicare especially. It should have all of the ICD-9 codes that you can use listed on there. I am not saying don't use the screening, rather just make sure it appropriate for your area. Also, beware of using hemmorhoid codes too! This Dx code is excluded from the LCD list for Michigan. We can't use it at all. Medicare won't pay and (of course) all the other payers follow. However, definitely use your diverticulosis codes, polyps, etc., if the doc documents them. I hope this helps...

Felicia Copeny, CPC-A
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-10-2008, 07:50 AM
nelenax's Avatar
nelenax nelenax is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Stuart
Posts: 320
nelenax is on a distinguished road
Default

Starting January 1, 2007 Medicare deductible is not waived IF the colorectal cancer screening test BECOMES a DIAGNOSTIC colorectal test, that is the service actually results in a biopsy or removal of a lesion or growth. You may find this information under the MLN Matters Number:SE0710 of the Medicare Website

Hope this helps!!!
__________________
nORaM
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-11-2008, 09:24 AM
cfuficat cfuficat is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Danville
Posts: 26
cfuficat is on a distinguished road
Default High Risk

Hi. According to MCR guidelines, the patient would be considered High Risk due to family hx of colon polyps. The primary dx should be V76.51 , V18.51, and additional dx codes for the hemorroids and diverticulosis. The HCPCS code should be G0105.

See the following CPT Assistant:
JAN 2004, Volume 14, Issue 1; pgs 4-7

AHA Coding Clinic:
1Q, 1995, Volume 12, Number 1, Page 4
1Q, 2004, Volume 21, Number 1, pgs 11-12

Also search under your MCR carrier for colonscopy guidelines due to carrier discretion.
For example http://www.highmarkmedicareservices....b/g1/g36g.html

Thanks,

Christy
CPC, RHIT



Quote:
Originally Posted by codermcdreamy View Post
Someone comes in for a rountine exam, has a family hx of colon polyps and nothing is found except for unspecified internal hemorrhoids and diverticulosis. Will the dx codes for the hemorroids and diverticulosis change the value of the screening? And how important is it to code those two along with the V76.51 and the V18.51?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:58 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC