Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Urology
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-24-2008, 01:03 AM
jbtrueba jbtrueba is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 18
jbtrueba is on a distinguished road
Question suprapubic catheter replaced through stoma - cpt?

What code would I use for insertion of suprapubic catheter through stoma. Documentation states; suprapubic catheter replaced, balloon inflated, 15cc's NS flushed until clear.
CPT 51705, per the CDR, states that a guidewire is used and the catheter is sutured to the skin. The documentation on the ER report I have does not state anything regarding a guidewire or suturing to the skin so I'm not sure 51705 would be the appropriate code. I am leaning more toward 51702, but I am not sure.
Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-24-2008, 06:03 PM
lingaraja lingaraja is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7
lingaraja is on a distinguished road
Default Suprapubic catheter placement

51102 would be appropriate for suprapubic catheter placement. You might wonder about the description of "Aspiration of bladder" in this code. However, there couldn't be any other purpose for placing suprapubic catheter.

Last edited by lingaraja; 12-25-2008 at 08:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-26-2008, 08:39 PM
jbtrueba jbtrueba is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 18
jbtrueba is on a distinguished road
Default

The catheter that was placed was an indwelling catheter. Why would 51102 (aspiration of bladder; by needle w/insertion of suprapubic catheter) be the more appropriate code?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-26-2008, 10:00 PM
magnolia1 magnolia1 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 456
magnolia1 is on a distinguished road
Smile

Refer to the 2007 CPT Assistant below.......you were on the right track with the 51705.

Surgery: Urinary System

Question:

Is code 51705 the correct code to report for change of a suprapubic catheter?

Answer:

Yes. Code 51705, Change of cystostomy tube; simple, may be reported to describe the removal of an existing suprapubic cystostomy tube with reinsertion of a new tube through the established cystostomy tunnel from the abdominal wall to the bladder. Code 51710, Change of cystostomy tube; complicated, may also be reported if the removal and replacement of the suprapubic tube involves a more complex encounter. Code 51102, Aspiration of bladder; with insertion of suprapubic catheter, involves performance of a stab wound on the lower abdomen (approximately 1 cm) above the pubis. A trocar suprapubic tube is inserted into the bladder. The balloon is inflated and the tube sutured into place. This code should be reported for the initial insertion of the suprapubic catheter when performed as described.
__________________
Karen Maloney, CPC
Data Quality Specialist
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2009, 09:06 AM
lsthilaire lsthilaire is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
lsthilaire is on a distinguished road
Default removal

How do I code for only a removal of suprapubic catheter?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-2009, 10:29 AM
magnolia1 magnolia1 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 456
magnolia1 is on a distinguished road
Default

I keep coming up with 53899 for the removal (assuming that it will be an incisional approach).
__________________
Karen Maloney, CPC
Data Quality Specialist
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-03-2009, 01:57 PM
seattlegrace seattlegrace is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10
seattlegrace is on a distinguished road
Default Suprapubic catheter removal

The non-incisional removal of a suprapubic catheter is part of the E/M code and is not reported with a CPT procedure code. However, I question when the catheter is removed (non-incisionally) and then a stitch is placed in the existing wound.

Would that just be inherent with the removal (E/M) since it is so minimal, or would it reported with a wound repair code. I am thinking it would just be part of the E/M since essentially the "wound" was surgically created. Therefore, closure of the wound would be inherent, as it is with most procedures.

Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-16-2013, 08:43 AM
gotro123 gotro123 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
gotro123 is on a distinguished road
Default

does code 51705 need an additional code if an ultrasound was done to confirm placement?
thanks
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC