Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-10-2009, 02:10 AM
bwruiz bwruiz is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
bwruiz is on a distinguished road
Default CPT codes 10022, 76536, & 76942

I work with an Endocrinologist who likes to bill CPT 10022, 76536, & 76942 bilaterally and with 2 units. From my understanding you can't bill CPT 76942 bil or with more than 1 unit. I'm unable to find any information on CPT 10022 or 76536, does anyone have any helpful inforamtion.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-10-2009, 02:41 AM
magnolia1 magnolia1 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 456
magnolia1 is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree with you about 76942.

I can't find anything that says you can't bill 10022 with a "50", but because of the code description (no anatomical sites noted), I think that Modifier "59" would be a better choice for any add'l FNAs done at saem session.

To the issue of 76536, is this being used at the same session as the above noted CPTs?
__________________
Karen Maloney, CPC
Data Quality Specialist
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2009, 01:56 PM
magnolia1 magnolia1 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 456
magnolia1 is on a distinguished road
Smile

okay......if Ultrasonic Guidance is being used to place the needle for the FNA, I do not believe that you should be coding for a separate Ultrasound done during the same session.
__________________
Karen Maloney, CPC
Data Quality Specialist

Last edited by magnolia1; 01-12-2009 at 01:57 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-12-2009, 08:22 PM
bwruiz bwruiz is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
bwruiz is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes 76536 is being billed the same way. Thanks for the help with 10022. I was thinking of add mod 59 but didn't want to do so unless I was perfectly clear about the mod 50 issue.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-12-2009, 08:23 PM
bwruiz bwruiz is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
bwruiz is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes same session sorry for the double post.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-18-2009, 12:51 PM
WOJCIECHOWSKI WOJCIECHOWSKI is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
WOJCIECHOWSKI is on a distinguished road
Default reimbursement for 10022

I also work with an Endocrinoligist who bills the 10022. We bill this code on a single line using the Modifiers 76 & 59. Recently I was told by one of the local insurance carriers that this code should be billed on seperate lines.

The Doctor bills for multiple nodule aspirations sometimes as many as 10.
Have you ever billed for this many and what is the reimbursemnt? We have been receiving full reimbursement for all units billed. This carrier stated that we should only receive full reimbursement for the first and 1/2 for the remainder.

Does anyone know what is correct?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-23-2009, 07:10 AM
nc_coder nc_coder is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mooresville
Posts: 244
nc_coder is on a distinguished road
Default

I work for a General Surgeon who specializes in thyroid. She does this often. I code the 10022 and the second 10022 with a 59. She always marks x2 by the 76942 but I only bill it once. Same for the 76536. I only bill it once. I have no problems getting it paid this way.
__________________
Jennifer Phillips, RHIT, CPC, CGSC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2010, 11:05 AM
WOJCIECHOWSKI WOJCIECHOWSKI is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
WOJCIECHOWSKI is on a distinguished road
Smile Reinbursement for billing of multiple thyroid nodule biopsies

Hi Jennifer...

Thanks for your response...my question now is the Endocrinologist I work for
performs a biopsy on multiple nodules...she may biopsy anywhere from 1 to 10depending on the size of the nodules I bill the 10022 using Mdifiers 76 & 59 also lt or rt (which is what the American Assc of Endocrinologist advised)

I have been receiving full reinbursement from all carriers for the multiple biopsies including Medicare, Recently one of the local HMO's are reimbursing in full for the first and 1/2 for the remainder. My argument is that even though this is a surgical procedure it is not a multiple procedure but a repeat procedure..The Dr is taking the same risk with every aspiration

Am I correct on this? Please advise if you have any experience in regards to reinbursement for the additional units

Thanks in advance for any information you may have
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC