Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Cardiology
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-22-2009, 10:11 AM
Lisa S. Lisa S. is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
Lisa S. is on a distinguished road
Default More questions re: Bubble Study...

Is everyone billing 96374 (previously 90774) for bubble study performed with echocardiography?
McKesson Clear Claim shows the 96374 will deny as incidental to the echo. Has anyone been able to justify the addition of modifier 59 to this code due to this edit?
__________________
Lisa S.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-23-2009, 09:01 AM
kmorrow kmorrow is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
kmorrow is on a distinguished road
Default

Under the CCI edits, the injection or infusion (e.g., 90774 or now 96374) is included as a component of the stress test. Separate charges should not be submitted for that service. Are you billing a stress test as a component of the echocardiography? That may the snag.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-23-2009, 11:00 AM
Lisa S. Lisa S. is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
Lisa S. is on a distinguished road
Default

Having to use 2008 codes in McKesson, I submitted the coding scenerio: 93303 & 90774 & received the edit stating "90774 was disallowed as global to procedure 93303".
__________________
Lisa S.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2009, 12:58 PM
pgraettinger pgraettinger is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
pgraettinger is on a distinguished road
Default

Quick question concerning coding of a Echo Bubble Study

Can we code the results of the test as the Indication/reason (diagnosis code) for performing the test (93303)?

Currently we are charging 93306, because the Physicians list the indications for the test as Stroke/TIA. According to the LCD, these will not cover 93303 as being Medical Necessity. Our director is stating that we can code the result of the test as the reason for performing the test. I do not agree.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2009, 08:07 AM
carroll5 carroll5 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
carroll5 is on a distinguished road
Default echocardiogram, complete

Please excuse any mistake I may make, I have never used this forum before, I hope to do it right...

We have a question about billing echocardiograms for 2009. We know there is a code 93306 which is new. It appears this includes the 93320 and 93325 and yet Medicare has advised me to bill the 93306, 93320-59, 93325-59. The commercial carriers are paying 93307, 93320 and 93325, which according to the CPT book is not correct either. Any help anyone can give would be greatly appreciated. Thanks...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-02-2009, 09:12 AM
Heartcoder Heartcoder  is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Heartcoder  is on a distinguished road
Default in response to new echo code

The 93306 now encompasses the 93320 and 93325. Effective Jan 2009 the 93307 can no longer be billed with 93320 and 93325. Payers should not be accepting claims with these 3 procedures in 2009 unless they are for older dates of service.

In Mass, Medicare is reimbursing us for the 93306 claims.

The 93303 (congenital echo) can be billed with 93320 and 93325 as long as your diagnosis supports a confirmed congenital issue.

I would call a supervisor at Medicare to get some guidance if you are not getting paid for your 93306 echos this year.

Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-11-2009, 09:56 AM
beatjones beatjones is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13
beatjones is on a distinguished road
Question Transthoracic echo for congenital cardiac anomalies

I have a question to the 93303 code. CCI edit now bundles the 93320 to the 93325. I haven't found any guidance on how these are billed. Should -59 be attached to the 93325 when billing with the 93320. Does this now mean there has to be a distinct service?

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-11-2009, 09:09 PM
deeva456 deeva456 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 253
deeva456 is on a distinguished road
Default

For billing a bubble study there isn't a separate code for the injection of the agitated saline. You would just bill the echo as 93306 or 93307 or if a limited bubble study is done, 93308.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC