Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Orthopaedics
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-13-2007, 10:15 AM
srwiles srwiles is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
srwiles is on a distinguished road
Default Joint Injections

One of my doctors does joint injections of the large joints (20610). He administers J3301, J2001, J0670 (kenallogg, marcaine, and lidocaine) in a premixed solution. The Medicare appeals line told our office that we should be adding a 59 modifier to the J2001 (lidocaine) for it to be paid. However it is all part of the same injection. Does anyone know how this can be correct?

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-13-2007, 10:54 AM
thompsonsyl's Avatar
thompsonsyl thompsonsyl is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 162
thompsonsyl is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi,

I thought your question was really interesting. I didn't realize that a modifier -59 could be used on J codes. I looked up cpt 20610 on the CCI Edits and it does list J2001 as a component code, however, the modifier indicator is (1) so a -59 is allowed to unbundle it.

My thinking is that since the injection site has to be anesthetized with the lidocaine in order to perform the arthrocentesis, it is considered "included". By adding the -59 modifier, you are telling Medicare that there is some reason why you are unbundling the lidocaine from the arthrocentesis being done. Does your MD use lidocaine for other than blocking the injection site?

Hope this helps & thanks for helping me to learn something new from your question!
__________________
Sylvia Thompson, CPC
Billing Supervisor
San Diego, CA
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-13-2007, 11:18 AM
safnlp safnlp is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 23
safnlp is on a distinguished road
Default

if you look up in the hcpcs you can not bill for lidocaine any more it is bundled in to the procedure
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2008, 07:18 PM
Catherine. Catherine. is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lewiston, Maine
Posts: 32
Catherine. is on a distinguished road
Default

The marcaine and lidocaine and kenalog are for pain relief and are not to be reported seperately when administered with another drug. (such as cortisone, synvisc etc.)
__________________
Catherine Nolin, CPC
cnolin78@yahoo.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-29-2008, 07:36 AM
Lisa Bledsoe Lisa Bledsoe is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 2,043
Lisa Bledsoe is on a distinguished road
Default

The kenalog is billable, but not the marcaine/lidocaine. If you read the description for J2001 it is for INTRAVENOUS infusion.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2008, 04:52 PM
Trendale Trendale is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 230
Trendale is on a distinguished road
Default The use of modifier 25 with E/M and injections

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa Curtis View Post
The kenalog is billable, but not the marcaine/lidocaine. If you read the description for J2001 it is for INTRAVENOUS infusion.
In regards to 20610 and J2001, is it appropriate to bill this with an E/M visit and should a modifier 25 be attached or would the injection be included in the E/M visit?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-07-2008, 05:18 PM
RebeccaWoodward* RebeccaWoodward* is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,129
RebeccaWoodward* will become famous soon enough
Default

This is a hot topic in our office. IMHO, I see no problem billing an e/m code if the physician assess' the patients complaint and with his medical decision making, decides to perform a joint injection. Now...if the physician offers the joint injection and the patient wants to "think about it" and comes in a week later for the injection, no, don't bill an e/m (again) with the joint injection. I feel that that the physician already provided the medical decision making for the e/m in the previous visit...therefore, only bill the joint injection with the kenalog. Medicare also told our office to apply the modifier 59 to the lidocaine injection, which was incorrect! Hope this helps~
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2008, 02:48 PM
Lisa Bledsoe Lisa Bledsoe is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 2,043
Lisa Bledsoe is on a distinguished road
Default

You can only bill the E/M with mod -25 if there is a significant separatey identifiable E/M from the reason for the joint injection. J2001 cannot be billed as it is for intravenous injection.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-09-2008, 01:20 PM
kandigrl79 kandigrl79 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: VIRGINIA
Posts: 115
kandigrl79 is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree with Lisa, up until two weeks ago, I worked for a very large ortho practice and you cannot bill for the lidocaine, you should bill the joint injection (20610) with the kenalog (j3301) and that's it. As far as the modifier 25 even if the doctor did the medical decision making for the e/m and the patient agreed to the injection, you cannot bill the e/m unless you evaluated the pt. for some other problem (hence modifier 25 which stipulates separately identifiable e/m service). Say for example the pt. presents complaining of knee pain and wrist pain, the doc. may decide to inject the knee and just watch the wrist, well in that case you could bill the e/m with modifier 25, but if the pt. simply presented with knee pain and the doc. decided to do a knee injection, you could only bill the injection and the drugs.
__________________
K-CPC
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-12-2008, 05:50 PM
nikkisgranny nikkisgranny is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 141
nikkisgranny is on a distinguished road
Smile Joint Injections

The use of when to use or when not to use -25 has me confused. The more I try to understand it the worse it becomes. Working in an ortho office, we, of course, do injections all day long.

New patients: Bill an E/M with a -25?

Established patient: New problem of knee pain; doctor suggests getting an injection (20610) to help calm the symptoms-bill E/M with -25 or just bill the procedure? What if they are following up on a current knee issue and the doctor suggests trying an injection for theraputic reasons?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC