|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a note were the surgeon performed: CABG x1 reverse saphenous vein graft, transseptal mitral valve replacement with 27 mm pericardial valve using chordal-sparing technique, extended Maze procedure on bypass, and TEE. This is straight forward to me.
My question is in his documentation he examines the tricuspid valve and actually places a ring, after intraoperative testing, decides that the tricuspid insufficiency was moderate, and the ring was removed. He does an excellent job documenting this. Can I bill this? Anyone's opinion is appreciated. Thanks. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
my first instinct is to say yes, it's ok to bill for it. If he actually did the entire procedure he should be able to bill for it.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would bill CPT 33463 - valvuloplasty, tricuspid vlave; without ring insertion. If the work involved in placing and then removing the ring was extensive, you could maybe add the -22 modifier.
Lisi, CPC |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know this was posted forever ago, but is a transseptal mitral valve replacement more difficult then a "regular" mitral valve replace?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|