Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Hematology/Oncology
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-21-2009, 06:42 AM
RNCPC0709 RNCPC0709 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: High Point
Posts: 73
RNCPC0709 is on a distinguished road
Default 88300 and 88304 same specimen

I have a provider that billed 88300 and 88304. I looked at the path report expecting to see two different specimens submitted. However, this was a tissue biopsy that contained a wood splinter. The provider is billing 88300 for the splinter and 88304 for the gross and micro on the tissue. Is this correct? I thought that the physician performing the procedure had to submit two separate containers? The fact that a foreign body is embedded in the tissue doesn't seem like you could bill a separate unit of 88300 for this. I can't find anything that addresses this specific scenario. Help please!

Thanks!
************
PB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-21-2009, 02:00 PM
RNCPC0709 RNCPC0709 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: High Point
Posts: 73
RNCPC0709 is on a distinguished road
Default Help please........

Anyone?...........

Thanks!!

************

PB
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2009, 06:56 AM
RNCPC0709 RNCPC0709 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: High Point
Posts: 73
RNCPC0709 is on a distinguished road
Default Really.....even an opinion would help!!!!!

Please help!!! Any path coder out there please help......even if it's a "best guess". I would really like some opinions on this before I have to send to the Medical Director.

Thanks!!!!

*******
PB
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-23-2009, 07:55 AM
Anna Weaver Anna Weaver is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 769
Anna Weaver is on a distinguished road
Default 88300 and 88304

Okay, I'm not at all sure here, but:
In CPT 2009 Professional Edition pages 373-374 it states in the dialogue prior to the codes:
Service code 88300 is used for any specimen that in the opinion of the examining pathologist can be accurately diagnosed without microscopic examination.
88300-Level 1, surgical pathology, gross examination only

Service codes 88304 through 88309 describe all other specimens requiring gross and microscopic examination, and represent additional ascending levels of physician work.
88304-Level III, surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination

This leads me to think the 88300 is included in the 88304 so would not be reported separately on the same specimen. Also, see below what CPT assistant has to say concerning multiple specimens.

Multiple pathological specimens
CPT Assistant, September 2000 Pages: 10,11 Category: Coding Consultation
Related Information
Surgical Pathology

Question

If two skin lesions are submitted together and are not separately identified, would this be reported as one or two specimens?

AMA Comment

The unit of service for the surgical pathology codes 88300-88309 is the specimen. A specimen is defined as tissue(s) that is (are) submitted for individual and separate attention, requiring individual examination and pathologic diagnosis.

Therefore, when material received for pathologic examination comprises multiple specimens, each specimen is considered a single unit of service and should be reported using a single code. For example, if two separate skin lesions are separately identified and submitted in a single container, the physician work related to each of these separately identified specimens would be reported as two units of service with code 88305. If, however, two separate skin lesions are submitted together and are not separately identified, then this would be reported as a single specimen as one unit of service with code 88305.




CPT Assistant © Copyright 1990–2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved

Hope this helps!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-24-2009, 11:44 AM
RNCPC0709 RNCPC0709 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: High Point
Posts: 73
RNCPC0709 is on a distinguished road
Default Thanks!!!!

Anna,

Thanks for taking a stab at this one.....I really appreciate it!


**************

PB
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-27-2009, 09:54 AM
whaleheadking whaleheadking is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 160
whaleheadking is on a distinguished road
Default

I have unbundled a gross exam for a surgical device out of a specimen but not a splinter out of a debridement. I suppose it's possible to do this, but I have the feeling the splinter is incidental and I wouldn't do it.

In the case of the device, it's amply described down to serial numbers and such. What's to talk about with a splinter?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-27-2009, 10:57 AM
Stephanie39 Stephanie39 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14
Stephanie39 is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm in agreement with whaleheadking...I'm thinking just as an appendix can be incidental to certain colon specimens, the actual splinter is incidental to this specimen. I think it's overkill to charge a separate gross charge just for saying the splinter was included in the sample.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-28-2009, 12:11 PM
RNCPC0709 RNCPC0709 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: High Point
Posts: 73
RNCPC0709 is on a distinguished road
Default Thanks for the replies...

Thanks, everyone, for the responses!

I did recommend to the medical director that we uphold the incidental denial. He agreed, so looks like they're not getting paid for both.

*****************
PB
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC