Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-15-2009, 12:51 PM
kumeena kumeena is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NYMAC
Posts: 542
kumeena is on a distinguished road
Default compliance/audit issue

I neeed everybody's feed back on this issue.In a teaching hospital setting resident writes notes and his diagnosis then Attending writes " I review the
HPI, Exam and diagnosis with resident", then he writes his findings and writes different diagnosis.

As per my knowledge if the attending doesn't write I agree/concur with resident diagnosis/findings I should code with Attending diagnosis.

Please help
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-15-2009, 03:04 PM
SCanterbury SCanterbury is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Jacksonville, FL River City Chapter
Posts: 74
SCanterbury is on a distinguished road
Default

If that's all he's writing then you've got a bigger problem than whose diagnoses to use.

The Teaching Physician note has to reflect that the TP performed or was present during the resident's performance of the key portions of the service. This is done via the TP note containing an explicit statement of TP presence face-to-face with the patient. Medicare gave many examples of sufficient TP notes, and they all began with "I saw the patient..." or "Patient seen with the resident..." or the like.

Based on the note you quoted, there is no indication that the TP made any face-to-face contact with the patient. They could have (and possibly did) only discuss the patient with the resident without setting foot in the room themselves.

Seth Canterbury, CPC, ACS-EM
Education Specialist
University of Florida Jacksonville Physicians, Inc.
Clinical Data Quality-Education Department
653 West Eight Street
Tower I, Suite 606
Jacksonville, FL 32209
(904) 244-9643
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-16-2009, 10:02 AM
LLovett LLovett is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,610
LLovett is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree with Seth.

Based on your above note you do not have a billable service at all.

Laura, CPC, CEMC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-16-2009, 10:09 AM
kumeena kumeena is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NYMAC
Posts: 542
kumeena is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you for your input.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-18-2009, 02:57 PM
FTessaBartels FTessaBartels is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 4,350
FTessaBartels is on a distinguished road
Default Wait a minute ...

Kumeena wrote: Attending writes " I review the HPI, Exam and diagnosis with resident", then he writes his findings and writes different diagnosis. (emphasis added by FTB)

I'd have to see the note to be certain ... but if the teaching physician documented his/her own findings you can use those elements to determine your level of service.

I do agree with the other posters that this attestation statement is inadequate by itself. The physician MUST indicate his/her presence and participation in the history, exam and MDM, and concurrence with the resident note (if that is the bulk of the documentation ... which it usually is).

HOWEVER .. if this is a commercial payer (NOT Medicare or Medicaid), this may still be a billable service. Most commercial payers allow the teaching physician to "supervise" by any means, including phone.

In any case, I would use the TP diagnosis over the resident diagnosis (assuming your documentation is billable).

Hope that helps.

F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC

Last edited by FTessaBartels; 09-22-2009 at 03:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-18-2009, 06:49 PM
kumeena kumeena is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NYMAC
Posts: 542
kumeena is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you Tessa
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-19-2009, 09:23 AM
smathis1 smathis1 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 97
smathis1 is on a distinguished road
Default

The teaching physician does not have to personally see the patient if covered under the primary care exception. (Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 12, Sect. 100.1.1.C)
Your term "teaching physician hospital" sounds like it was an inpatient service (?), but if it was an office visit, the rules may be different because of the primary care exception.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:47 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2011, AAPCAd Management plugin by RedTyger