Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Podiatry

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-12-2009, 03:00 PM
jhack jhack is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 47
jhack is on a distinguished road
Default proper billing of services

I have a Doctor who always does an office visit with the paring or cutting of lesion (11055 or 11056). The e/m is never seperate so there isn't a 25 modifier applied. The question is, does the Doctor HAVE to bill the 11055 or 11056 if done with the e/m visit? The question is coming up because e/m gets bundled into service and is paid as a lower amount. Doctor wants to know if he can just bill out the e/m and not the paring or cutting of lesion. My thought is the service must be billed because it was done. Am I correct in my thinking? Any comments are appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-12-2009, 03:08 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 6,947
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

If a code exisits for the service performed then that is the code you select. This is the way it was always explained to me. Why do you say the E&M is never separate? Was the patient scheduled to come in for the procedure? If so I agree no E&M should be charged. However if the evaluation is over above and beyond the evaluation needed just for the procedure then you should have the E&M with the 25 and the procedure with no problem.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-12-2009, 03:18 PM
Lisa Bledsoe Lisa Bledsoe is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 2,034
Lisa Bledsoe is on a distinguished road
Default

I am in agreement with Debra.
__________________
Lisa Bledsoe, CPC, CPMA
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-13-2009, 06:08 AM
jhack jhack is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 47
jhack is on a distinguished road
Wink

Yes, the patients are scheduled to come in for the service. If the Dr. is spending more time than usual on the service wouldn't it be more appropriate to put a 22 mdifier on the service. I guess I don't follow why you would put a 25 modifier on the e/m??? If the e/m isn't a seperate service how could the 25 mod. be added? Thanks for the clarification.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-13-2009, 06:15 AM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 6,947
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

Ok so they are scheduled to come in for the procedure and for some reason the procedure is more involved? then yes a 22 on the procedure code, but not because he spent time talking to or examining the pt.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-13-2009, 06:40 AM
jhack jhack is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 47
jhack is on a distinguished road
Default

Correct, if the procedure for some reason took longer then adding the 22 mod. would be ok.

But my question was with the 25 mod. comment on the e/m. If they are coming if for a scheduled lesion removal how could you put a mod on the e/m? It's not seperate and distinct from the service. OR ..... Should the e/m not even be billed?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2009, 08:24 AM
Lisa Bledsoe Lisa Bledsoe is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 2,034
Lisa Bledsoe is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhack View Post
Correct, if the procedure for some reason took longer then adding the 22 mod. would be ok.

But my question was with the 25 mod. comment on the e/m. If they are coming if for a scheduled lesion removal how could you put a mod on the e/m? It's not seperate and distinct from the service. OR ..... Should the e/m not even be billed?
If scheduled for the procedure and no other problems addressed to meet the criteria for a separate E/M; then NO you should not code and E/M with mod -25.
__________________
Lisa Bledsoe, CPC, CPMA
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-13-2009, 08:29 AM
jhack jhack is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 47
jhack is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks, that sums it all up. I appreciate all of the feedback.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:35 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2011, AAPCAd Management plugin by RedTyger