Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Diagnosis Coding
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-14-2009, 07:53 AM
heatherwinters heatherwinters is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Malone
Posts: 358
heatherwinters is on a distinguished road
Default Urosepsis vs UTI

I am very confused. The clinician documented the patient has "mild urosepsis with gram-negative rods, ID and sensitivities pending". The urine culture was greater than 100,000 gram negative rods. On his billing sheet, he wants to bill Sepsis for the hospital encounter. Do I use 599.0 or 995.91. On the subsequent hospital day, the documentation indicates Mild sepsis due to ecoli from urinary source-pyelonephritis.
Question: How would I code the first day
How would I code the second day

I am very confused about whether to code as 599.0 with 041.4 or if I use 995.91 and 041.4.
__________________
Heather Winters, CPC, CFPC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-14-2009, 08:10 AM
Rani Rani is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Rani is on a distinguished road
Default

Heather--

At the meeting I went to awhile ago just for this issue, we were told that to code the sepsis, there has to be certain criteria met--there have to be co-conditions due to the sepsis such as, fever, funky blood work results etc. Otherwise, you have to code down to the 599.0-UTI.
I don't have my "cheat sheet" in this office today otherwise I could give you better specifics--but hope I helped some.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-14-2009, 05:12 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,328
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

Go to the guidelines for ICD-9 the subject of sepsis is well covered. You must code an organism first listed so the ecoli, then the 995.9x secondary
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-15-2009, 09:20 AM
heatherwinters heatherwinters is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Malone
Posts: 358
heatherwinters is on a distinguished road
Default Sepsis

Icd-9 states you cannot code sepsis unless two or more of the following symptoms are documented: fever, tachycardia, tachypenia, leukocytosis aor leukopenia. If the doctor writes Sepsis, however, there is no documentation in the note of two of these, then you cannot use a 995.9 code, correct?
__________________
Heather Winters, CPC, CFPC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2009, 10:05 AM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,328
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

You can code sepsis if the physician documents sepsis. The physician is allowed to state any infection diagnosis based on the clinical presentation of the patient. Where are you reading the part about needing the presence of two or more symptoms?
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-15-2009, 11:04 AM
heatherwinters heatherwinters is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Malone
Posts: 358
heatherwinters is on a distinguished road
Default Sepsis

Icd-9-cm 995.9 DEF in the 2010 expert book.
DEF: CLINICAL RESPONSE TO INFECTION OR TRAUMA THAT CAN TRIGGER ACUTE INFLAMMATORY REACTION AND PROGRESSES TO COAGULATION, IMPARIED FIBROINOLYSIS, AND ORGAN FAILURE; MAINFESTED BY TWO OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING SYMPTOMS: FEVER, TACHYCARDIA, TACHYPNEA, LEUKOCYTOSIS OR LEUKOPENIA

See also
http://www.hcpro.com/content/202827.pdf
Quote:
Sepsis, code 995.91: is synonymous with SIRS due to infection without organ dysfunction. This is an infection-induced syndrome defined by the presence of two or more of the following features of systemic inflammation:
– Fever (oral temperature > 38°C or 100.4°F) or hypothermia (oral temperature < 36°C or 96.8°F)
– Leukocytosis (white count > 12,000) or leukopenia (white count < 4,000 or > 10% bands)
– Tachycardia (> 90 beats per minute)
– Tachypnea (respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute or
a pCO2 of < 32 mmHg)
__________________
Heather Winters, CPC, CFPC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-15-2009, 02:25 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,328
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

Ok that is a clinical description of sepsis, however the physician does not have to list these symptoms nor do we have to look for them in the documentation, If the physician documents the condition as sepsis then we code it. Also if we only see the clinical indications of sepsis listed by the physician we as the coder do not assign a dx of sepsis.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-08-2012, 05:20 AM
coder17 coder17 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 42
coder17 is on a distinguished road
Default

So if you have listed urosepsis due to streptococcus then an addendum to the record states sepsis with streptococcus septicemia and uti due to streptococcus B, you would code the it as sepsis not urosepsis correct?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-08-2012, 10:08 AM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,328
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

There is no code for urosepsis so you would code the infection, the sepsis, and the local infection which all adds up to the condition of urosepsis.
FYI - ICD -10 CM if the provider documents urosepsis, we cannot code it we must query for a better diagnosis, we are not allowed to default to the UTI unspecified code. Per the guidelines.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-08-2012, 04:34 PM
tmlbwells tmlbwells is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 81
tmlbwells is on a distinguished road
Default

I was taught that a lot of doctors use urosepsis interchangeably with UTI, so I've coded it as 599.0 is there isn't any other documentation.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:28 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC