Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Outpatient Facilities
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 02-17-2008, 04:16 PM
sdyches sdyches is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Augusta chapter
Posts: 17
sdyches is on a distinguished road
Default

I don't know for sure, but it seems to me that if the ASC owns the equipment and read them, there would be no need for a modifier except the SG for ASG for Medicare. We get paid for them. I would appreciate any input.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-06-2008, 02:28 PM
cconroycpch cconroycpch is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Palm Beach
Posts: 69
cconroycpch is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdyches View Post
I don't know for sure, but it seems to me that if the ASC owns the equipment and read them, there would be no need for a modifier except the SG for ASG for Medicare. We get paid for them. I would appreciate any input.
sdyches - I am curious as to what state your facility is in that you are getting reimbursed for the fluoro and what insurance companies are reimbursing you and how much. Also, does your ASC facility have a physician employed there that does the reading of the fluoro? Your facility does not pay the physician for his service, you can not bill for the professional component and would therefore need to have the TC modifier on your bill for the fluoro.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-10-2008, 05:40 PM
acuaria76 acuaria76 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
acuaria76 is on a distinguished road
Default Flouro

Our facility does not own the equipment. We have a tech that comes over from an imaging center next door and she operates the equipment while the surgeon does the procedure. In this case, should I be billing the flouroscopy with the TC modifier? Please help!!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-10-2008, 07:18 PM
codegirl0422's Avatar
codegirl0422 codegirl0422 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 257
codegirl0422 is on a distinguished road
Talking Just a thought

I bill for my GI doctors and they also have their own ASC, which I also bill for. If fluroscopy is used, I bill the ASC with TC modifier and the physician porition with the 26 modifier. They way it works for us is the ASC owns the machine not the physician. The ASC and the physician are separate, different tax id's and everything. My doctor's have different provider numbers for the ASC than they do for their office. This is different than if done in the office. Yes there you could bill without modifiers because physician and technical are billed under the same tax id #/provider #. Our insurance's deny it as global to the procedure (CO97), mainly BC of AL denies but there are others

Quote:
Originally Posted by cconroycpch View Post
If your physician owns the equipment and uses it during procedures, you do not use any modifier. This would mean that you are billing globally (for the technical and professional components). You also state that most insurances do not pay for it. What is their denial reason? Are you being denied for both the professional and technical components? What insurance companies are denying?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-10-2008, 07:25 PM
codegirl0422's Avatar
codegirl0422 codegirl0422 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 257
codegirl0422 is on a distinguished road
Default

I am not positive, but it shoulds like the tech is doing the TC portion. Is the doctor reading anything, etc that maybe a 26 modifier could be used. Do you bill for the facility and physician. For the facility, you may not be able to bill anything but for the physician bill the 26 modifier. See my other post within this thread, I dont know if this helps or not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by acuaria76 View Post
Our facility does not own the equipment. We have a tech that comes over from an imaging center next door and she operates the equipment while the surgeon does the procedure. In this case, should I be billing the flouroscopy with the TC modifier? Please help!!!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-14-2008, 10:55 AM
dawnee dawnee is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
dawnee is on a distinguished road
Default ascbiller

Does anyone know when billing for a 62290/ 62291 do you bill for the epidurogram(72285/72295) per level or just once, and also for radiofrequencies do you bill the fluoroscopy per level or just once? Please help!!!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-16-2008, 08:40 AM
codegirl0422's Avatar
codegirl0422 codegirl0422 is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 257
codegirl0422 is on a distinguished road
Default

72285 72295 per level
fluoroscopy only once

Quote:
Originally Posted by dawnee View Post
Does anyone know when billing for a 62290/ 62291 do you bill for the epidurogram(72285/72295) per level or just once, and also for radiofrequencies do you bill the fluoroscopy per level or just once? Please help!!!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-27-2008, 01:03 PM
gared111 gared111 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 45
gared111 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcraig View Post
I have another question regarging fluro in an asc. We are a pain clinic. We do one surgical session, and I bill on fluro with a TC modifier. I was recently audited by an outside coding person who told me I needed to bill a fluro with every injection we did, with a 59 modifier. Any feedback?
Sounds like that auditor needs to go back to school! You only bill it once unless multiple sites are being injected (example, dr injects C2-3 & also L4-L5 in the same session...you can bill a 2nd flouro with a TC 59( modifier). If multiple injections are performed in one region (example Lumbar L1-2 L3-4 L4-5) you can only bill it once.

Last edited by gared111; 03-27-2008 at 01:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-30-2008, 06:16 AM
jennifer.cooper jennifer.cooper is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 17
jennifer.cooper is on a distinguished road
Default

You can't append the modifier -26 and TC for the same physican on the same date. If you own the equipement and the same doc reads the report you would use the global billing code which is not modifiers should be appended for the global billing.

I have seen claims come in that some people will bill it on a different line item. Some even have one Line item 99999-26
99999-TC-59
This will not get paid EVER or at least not by my company.

sdyches you are correct if both TC and -26.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-09-2008, 02:38 PM
coderlady coderlady is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13
coderlady is on a distinguished road
Wink Radiology in the ASC

Does anyone bill regular x-ray codes in their ASC?? Not just 76000? I'm wondering what the guidelines are now that Medicare allows some radiology codes to be billed in an ASC. i have a case where the patient had a great toe fracture and surgeon says, "we brought in a mini C-arm and took AP and lateral views of the great toe and note that we were in bone (for pinning) and that we did not appear to be in the joint and our reduction was adequate." Is this enough to bill for 73660? Haven't done this before so want to make sure I know what I'm doing..... Thanks all!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:48 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC