Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-03-2010, 05:34 AM
dballard2004 dballard2004 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,143
dballard2004 is on a distinguished road
Default Cerumen Removal and Foreign Body

How would a provider correctly code an encounter for both a cerumen removal and a foreign body removal from the ear when irrigation curettage. Would it be the same CPT only or would they use the CPT and an E/M with -25 appended? Am I correct that if a foreign body is removed without an incision, that it falls under the E/M code?
__________________
Dawson Ballard, Jr., CPC, CEMC, CPMA, CCS-P
Coder
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2010, 11:21 AM
Anna Weaver Anna Weaver is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kokomo, IN
Posts: 769
Anna Weaver is on a distinguished road
Default

CPT assistant says for foreign body:

CPT Lay Descriptions

69200-69205 (69200, 69205)

Under direct visualization, the physician or technician removes a foreign body from the external auditory canal using delicate forceps, a cerumen spoon, or suction. In the case of a live insect, oil is dropped into the ear to immobilize it before it is removed. No anesthetic or local anesthetic is used in 69200. If a child or an adult cannot tolerate the procedure while awake, it is performed under general anesthesia in 69205. Code 69205 is also reported in cases where the foreign body is so large, an incision is made in the external meatus to enlarge the opening before the foreign body can be extracted.

My opinion is that since you would use the same type instruments to remove the foreign body as you do the cerumen and since cerumen is considered "separate procedure" you would only report the 69200. This is in the NCCI edit list with a 1, but my thinking is that if you do one ear for foreign body and the same ear for impaction cerumen removal, then it's considered inclusive so 69200. If you do both ears cerumen impaction removal (69210)and one ear foreign body removal (69200), then you could justify both codes with a 59 modifier on the 69210. I also ran this through our 3M and it flags you and says 69200 is considered a comprehensive code.

Good luck!
__________________
Anna Weaver, CPC, CPMA, CEMC
Associate Auditor
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2010, 11:53 AM
dballard2004 dballard2004 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,143
dballard2004 is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks.
__________________
Dawson Ballard, Jr., CPC, CEMC, CPMA, CCS-P
Coder
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2010, 12:38 PM
RebeccaWoodward* RebeccaWoodward* is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,129
RebeccaWoodward* will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dballard2004 View Post
How would a provider correctly code an encounter for both a cerumen removal and a foreign body removal from the ear when irrigation curettage. Would it be the same CPT only or would they use the CPT and an E/M with -25 appended? Am I correct that if a foreign body is removed without an incision, that it falls under the E/M code?
You are correct that most foreign body removals require an incision; however, 69200 does not. For those codes that do require an incision and an incision isn't the method of removal, the guidelines do direct you to an E/M code. As for 69200, the CDR states that the removal technique could be forceps (tweezers), a curette spoon, or suction. I do agree with Anna that if both procedures are for the same ear, I would only bill 69200 w/ ICD-9 code 931 since 69210 is listed as a separate procedure. Also, the RVU's for 69200 are slightly higher. If your documentation can support a separate, identifiable E/M, this would be reportable, also (w/ mod 25).

Last edited by RebeccaWoodward*; 02-03-2010 at 12:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2010, 01:11 PM
dballard2004 dballard2004 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,143
dballard2004 is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks.
__________________
Dawson Ballard, Jr., CPC, CEMC, CPMA, CCS-P
Coder
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:03 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC