Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > E/M
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-26-2010, 01:46 PM
efrohna's Avatar
efrohna efrohna is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 116
efrohna is on a distinguished road
Default 99285 Acuity Caveat

Can anyone tell me where the wording in the 2010 CPT book defines the 99285 acuity caveat? I'm being told that it no longer exists and I want to verify if that is true or not?
__________________
Evangelina Frohna, CPC, CEMC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:08 PM
OCD_coder's Avatar
OCD_coder OCD_coder is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nashville AAPC Chapter
Posts: 762
OCD_coder is an unknown quantity at this point
Default acuity caveat

It has always been written under the 99285 CPT descriptor:
...."requires these three key components witin the constraints imposed by the urgency of the patient's clinical condition and mental status."

Will this help with what you're looking?

Each regional Mediare carrier apply the caveat differently, so check with their requirements on what parts of the E/M they allow the application.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-31-2010, 02:12 PM
efrohna's Avatar
efrohna efrohna is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 116
efrohna is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi Michelle,
Thanks for responding. That is what I thought as well. I don't know what State you are in? I'm in Wisconsin, and the acuity caveat is not allowed for WPS-Medicare, but it still stands for non-Medicare. I was at a recent coding symposium in WI this past Fall and this same issue was brought up & the ED Physician said it was still valid. However, after further research it is not valid for Medicare anymore.
~Vangie
__________________
Evangelina Frohna, CPC, CEMC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-01-2010, 02:29 PM
FTessaBartels FTessaBartels is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 4,441
FTessaBartels will become famous soon enough
Default History

Evangelina,
I believe you are referring to counting the ROS and PFSH as complete when the physician documents the reason it cannot be completed (e.g. patient in coma, no family members present).

Yes, WPS Medicare requires us to use the 99499 Unlisted E/M service, and charge the equivalent fee of the E/M we WOULD have charged had the history been complete.

For example ... if you had a comprehensive exam and high MDM with a critically injured patient who was unresponsive (so you couldn't get a complete history), you would use 99499 but base you fee on 99285. (Of course if you provided critical care of 30 minutes or more, you could use the 99291-99292 codes instead.)

Wouldn't it be nice if everyone did things the same way!? (When they let me rule the world, that will be the first rule I implement ... well, right after chocolate not having any calories.)

Hope that helps.

F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-2010, 03:19 PM
efrohna's Avatar
efrohna efrohna is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 116
efrohna is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi F. Tessa,
Yes, we are on the same page! We would take the 99499 and equate to the level the physician initially selected. On the back end of this, Medicare is still denying and we are appealing with a copy of their own rule. This has not been fun, but we're doing our best compliance-wise. Thanks for your input!
__________________
Evangelina Frohna, CPC, CEMC
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-05-2010, 06:41 AM
glenski91175 glenski91175 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
glenski91175 is on a distinguished road
Default

does anyone have a link for WPS where this policy is found? I just talked to them and was told there was no such policy about the level 5 caveat.
thanks
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2010, 01:37 PM
efrohna's Avatar
efrohna efrohna is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 116
efrohna is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by glenski91175 View Post
does anyone have a link for WPS where this policy is found? I just talked to them and was told there was no such policy about the level 5 caveat.
thanks
Glenski91175, I believe where all the confusion comes in is in the description of 99285 in the CPT book it defined...."requires these three key components witin the constraints imposed by the urgency of the patient's clinical condition and mental status." This was considered the 99285 caveat by the Wisconsin Medical Society, and a lot of ED physicians used this as well. However, WPS-Medicare does not recognize this anymore, and it was removed from WMS website. Hope this helps.
__________________
Evangelina Frohna, CPC, CEMC

Last edited by efrohna; 05-13-2010 at 11:48 AM. Reason: More detail
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:47 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC