Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > E/M

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-29-2010, 11:58 AM
punkyboo punkyboo is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St. Louis Missouri - West
Posts: 74
punkyboo is on a distinguished road
Question 1995 or 1997 Guidelines/choose 1 and stick to it?

Hi all,

I have looked and looked and can't seem to find anything concrete on my question.

I could swear I was told before that an office had to choose which guidelines to use in E/M documentation (1995 or 1997) and stick with that. Now I have been told that the office can choose to use 1995 or 1997 guidelines, on a case by case basis.

I need to know because apparently the Medicare RAC is "knocking at our door." Yikes...

~Kat
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-29-2010, 12:05 PM
RebeccaWoodward*'s Avatar
RebeccaWoodward* RebeccaWoodward* is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,095
RebeccaWoodward* will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by katcpc View Post
Hi all,

I have looked and looked and can't seem to find anything concrete on my question.

I could swear I was told before that an office had to choose which guidelines to use in E/M documentation (1995 or 1997) and stick with that. Now I have been told that the office can choose to use 1995 or 1997 guidelines, on a case by case basis.

I need to know because apparently the Medicare RAC is "knocking at our door." Yikes...

~Kat
Carriers and A/B Medicare Administration Contractors (MACs) are to continue reviews using both the 1995 and 1997 Documentation Guidelines for E&M Services (whichever is more advantageous to the physician).

http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MLNEdwebGuide/25_EMDOC.asp

You have the option of both; however, you must use one set of guidelines for that patient encounter.
__________________
Rebecca CPC, CPMA, CEMC




Your click COUNTS...

http://www.thebreastcancersite.com/c...faces?siteId=2

CLICK to give FREE mammograms!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-29-2010, 02:22 PM
punkyboo punkyboo is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St. Louis Missouri - West
Posts: 74
punkyboo is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-30-2010, 10:34 AM
LTibbetts's Avatar
LTibbetts LTibbetts is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bangor, Maine
Posts: 719
LTibbetts is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I took an E&M seminar a couple of months ago and she claimed that either/or is fine, although, it seems that the clinics choose to stick with the 1997 DG's, since it is more advantagous to them. Then she said that most auditors from CMS like to use the 95 DG's, which are a little more refined than the 97 DG's, which is what I use in the hospital that I work at. Whether or not that is the golden rule, I can't be sure, but it certainly made sense to me.
__________________
Leslie, CPC, CEDC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-01-2010, 07:04 PM
punkyboo punkyboo is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St. Louis Missouri - West
Posts: 74
punkyboo is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for your input, Leslie!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-02-2010, 05:27 PM
1071471 1071471 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 38
1071471 is on a distinguished road
Wink

If you don't have one already, I would definitely have a policy and procedure in place to protect your organization. That is one of the first things CMS asks for when there is an audit.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:51 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2011, AAPCAd Management plugin by RedTyger