Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Orthopaedics
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-13-2010, 01:11 PM
trvlingal trvlingal is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 28
trvlingal is on a distinguished road
Default Exchange of polyethylene liner, knee

Does anyone know the CPT code for the exchange of a polyethylene liner of the knee?
The physician's report reads "Utilizing approximately 3000 mL of sterile normal saline with bacitracin, we started liberal irrigation procedure. Following that, we removed the polyethylene liner and irrigated more fluid through the knee. A new polyethylene liner was inserted".

Thanks for your help!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-14-2010, 11:13 AM
twosmek's Avatar
twosmek twosmek is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 138
twosmek is on a distinguished road
Default

I do believe that you would use the revision code and use a 52 modifier!
__________________
Tina Wosmek CPC, COSC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-14-2010, 02:09 PM
kadensmom kadensmom is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 42
kadensmom is on a distinguished road
Default

There is a Pink Sheets article that directly addresses this I believe...

I believe this is 27486/52 if the exchange goes off without a hitch. If there is a great amount of work or skill involved - difficulty removing, lodged under one of the components, etc. you can use 27486 without modifier 52...but I think that'd be comparable to justifying a modifier 22 in terms of documentation.

If it was an easy out-easy in, I'd use 27486/52.

Kara Hawes, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-15-2010, 05:40 AM
BCrandall BCrandall is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 173
BCrandall is on a distinguished road
Default

The Coder's Desk Reference states that revision codes 27486/87 apply to the femoral and tibial components only. I use the unlisted (27599) myself.
__________________
Bruce Crandall, CPC
North Carolina Specialty Hospital
Durham, NC
www.ncspecialty.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2011, 09:11 AM
twosmek's Avatar
twosmek twosmek is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 138
twosmek is on a distinguished road
Default

http://ortho.decisionhealth.com/Arti...aspx?id=150787

Here is the article stating to use 27486
__________________
Tina Wosmek CPC, COSC
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2011, 08:35 AM
coderlady coderlady is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13
coderlady is on a distinguished road
Default Polyethylene Exchange

Hi Tina,

I can't get into that article but would love to read it. I have a case right now where surgeon exchanges the polyethylene insert and I'd like to know if I should bill the 27486 -52..... Thanks, Kathy G.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2011, 10:59 AM
twosmek's Avatar
twosmek twosmek is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Duluth, MN
Posts: 138
twosmek is on a distinguished road
Default

Here is the article. I cut and pasted it. Hope it helps

Removing poly liner in arthroplasty – complex or simple? Tips on deciding whether or not to use -52

Your orthopedic surgeon schedules a patient for a revision of the tibial component of a right knee total arthroplasty, but instead of revising the entire component, he just needs to replace the polyethylene liner.

You should bill this procedure using 27486 (revision of total knee arthroplasty, with or without allograft; one component), potentially adding modifier -52 (reduced services), says Robert Haralson, MD, the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) coding committee chair. This is correct because you are revising just one component and depending on the work involved in removing the poly liner from the tibial component you may need to append modifier -52 to indicate that the full description of the given code was not performed.

Hold on, though. Don’t automatically append modifier -52. There are times when the removal of the liner is more complex than simply popping it out and replacing it with a new one. Often, the doctor will find that the poly liner has become lodged under the lip of the metal component. Such an instance will require the surgeon to use greater skills and more work. This sort of scenario could thus possibly support reporting of the code without a modifier -52.

Code 27486 has 35.84 relative value units (RVUs), which Medicare reimburses at $1,338.17 (Medicare facility rate, unadjusted for geographic locality). In this procedure, the orthopedist is revising one component – normally consisting of removing the poly liner, removing a prosthetic and replacing it with a new prothesis. When you’re strictly replacing the poly liner, the -52 modifier tells the carrier you are not providing the full service as defined by the code descriptor and that payment should be adjusted.

Note: When it is time to submit the claim form, do so with the full amount of the procedure listed, not a discounted amount. “For most payers, I’d recommend submitting the full fee and letting them take their standard percentage cut…” says Jo Ann Steigerwald , RHIT, ACS-GI, ACS-OH, Medical Business Specialists, Baraboo, Wisc.
__________________
Tina Wosmek CPC, COSC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-30-2013, 07:26 AM
martha@mtbj.net martha@mtbj.net is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
martha@mtbj.net is on a distinguished road
Default

This has always been my understanding that you always code the 27486 with 52 modifier when the surgeon replaces the polyethelene liner. Just today my surgeon said he read in one of his magazines if the intent is just to to do arthrotomy and clean out infection or hematoma you do not charge this revison code?? He did replace the liner on this one.
Any comments or suggestions or recent articles is appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-20-2013, 11:43 AM
christinnagle christinnagle is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Johnstown Chapter
Posts: 25
christinnagle is on a distinguished road
Default confusion

I have also read this new article where an arthrotomy is recommended based on the explantation and exchange of the polyliner is inclusive to debride the joint space. I am more confused than ever since the article is a contradiction to a previous article that company provided with guidance to use 27486-52 for the polyliner/revision.
I now have two reliable coding sources with conflicting coding recommendations.

any advise is recommended. tia
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:25 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC