Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-05-2010, 11:48 AM
mrolf mrolf is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 152
mrolf is on a distinguished road
Default Diagnosis code for a follow-up visit

If a patient comes in for follow-up on bronchitis and physician states "bronchitis resolved", what ICD-9 diagnosis code would you use? Should it be V67.59 and 490?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-05-2010, 01:50 PM
DGWILSON DGWILSON is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 87
DGWILSON is on a distinguished road
Default diagnosis

Follow up visits with resolved conditions are still coded with the same ICD-9 code as the first visit. See the link below.


http://www.supercoder.com/articles/a...ltiple-visits/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-05-2010, 02:23 PM
sbflower sbflower is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
sbflower is on a distinguished road
Default Both

I use a V code and the the original Dx. So yes, both. I did not check the accuracy of your codes in particular, I just want to let you know that I use both a V and a Dx code.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2010, 07:42 PM
suzy363 suzy363 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
suzy363 is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes we also use the V code and the original DX code if documentation states resolved. The key here is resolved vs resolving.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2010, 05:48 AM
dballard2004 dballard2004 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,143
dballard2004 is on a distinguished road
Default

I disagree! If the diagnosis is resolved, you can't code it. You would report the appropriate V code for the follow-up (from the V67 category), then as a secondary code, you would report a V code for history of the condition that you are following up for. This is per the ICD-9-CM guidelines.
__________________
Dawson Ballard, Jr., CPC, CEMC, CPMA, CCS-P
Coder

Last edited by dballard2004; 05-12-2010 at 05:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-18-2010, 03:03 PM
FTessaBartels FTessaBartels is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 4,436
FTessaBartels will become famous soon enough
Default Follow-up

The physician doesn't know the condition is resolved until s/he evaluates the patient. Code the condition (bronchitis in your example).

Once patient has completed treatment for the condition and the physician is no longer treating it, if the patient comes back with similar symptoms you can code the "history of" (assuming the physician documents it, of course).

Hope that helps.

F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-18-2010, 06:19 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,311
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

I am a little confused by the scenario. If the condition was known to be resolved prior to this encounter then I agree with Dawson. However if this was a visit to check the patients condition, then that is different. Infections/inflamations we assume are still present and that is the reason for the encounter so I agree with Tessa the physician must examine to pt first and renders the dx of resolved so we code the condition. Never code both the V code for follow up plus the condition.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-19-2010, 06:29 AM
CC5657 CC5657 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 93
CC5657 is on a distinguished road
Question

Another scenario; If the physcian sees a patient in the hospital for ARF,(say from NSAIDS or a rise in creatinine due to contrast reaction). The ARF is resolved when discharged from the hospital, but the physician wants to F/U with him in a couple of weeks. At the visit, all labs are normal. Would you code the ARF?

Very confusing:
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-19-2010, 11:02 AM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,311
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

No you would code it as a follow up with a V67.x
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC