Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Billing/Reimbursement

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-07-2010, 07:56 AM
efuhrmann efuhrmann is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 236
efuhrmann is on a distinguished road
Default 59 vs 51 reimbursement

Does anyone, in their experience, know how insurers reimburse for procedures with modifiers 59 and 51. I understand that the mod 51, if correctly placed will decrease reimbursement by 50% per line item. Is that correct and who does your "checking"? Now let's say 2 procedures are done-one through the abdomen and one through the vagina. Not bundled(per edits) so no modifier. Should I expect 100% reimbursement per fee schedule for both codes? If you need an example I have 57288 and 58661. I understand the endoscopic family reimbursement with mod 59(so I think). Thanks for any input.
__________________
Elizabeth Fuhrmann CPC, BSN
Longmont Clinic
Longmont, CO
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-07-2010, 08:06 AM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 7,000
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

Most payers discount the second and subsequent procedure performed in the same session, the reason for this is they consider that part of the reimbursement for each procedure includes a portion for prep and when you do more than one procedure in the same session then the prep does not need to be redone sotherefore it is not paid for twice and the second procedure is discounted to carve out the prep portion. The 51 modifier was/is used to signify that this should occur. With electronic processing most carriers have built an edit to automatically discount the second and subsequent procedure so they no longer want/need the 51 modifier. The 59 modifer is used to indicate a distinc procedure that would otherwise be bundled with a comprehensive procedure. So to answer you question "Should I expect 100% reimbursement per fee schedule for both codes?" no you should not because the payer in all likelihood will discount the one with the lower RVU. If these procedure were performed in two separate sessions then you would need a modifier to stop the automatic discounting. I hope this helps to clarify for you.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-08-2010, 06:38 PM
ollielooya ollielooya is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 632
ollielooya is on a distinguished road
Default

Soooo, Debra IF the insurance company DOES have the built in edits to discount the additional procedures AND IF it is billed with a modifier 51 anyway, will that discount the revenue even further? Will the payment be affected? Suzanne E. Byrum, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-08-2010, 07:09 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 7,000
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

No they do not discount more due to the presence of the 51. The only thing to watch out for is the issue that some payers (quite a few actually) have deleed the 51 modifier from the electronic edits, and what that means is the presence of the 51 on your claim can have that line item reject for invalid modifier. So you need to find out those payers that still require it and those that do not want it. Also there are some CPT codes that are 51 exempt, this includes all codes with a + sign next to the number and the ones with a 0 with a line thru it, there is an appendix that lists all 51 exempt codes.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2011, AAPCAd Management plugin by RedTyger