|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Very confused about what to code for this surgery. I have codes 27310 and 11981, but obviously way more was done and I dont know how to bill for this. A copy of the Op Note is below. Any help would be greatly appriciated.
OPERATION POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Previously infected left total knee with 90 degrees or more flexion contracture spasticity and potential persistent infection. POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: 1. Arthrotomy removal of infection 2. Debridement and soft tissue contracture release. 3. Placement of articulating antibiotic spacer. INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION: The patient is a 49-year-old female who has a history of previous cervical spine injury when she was younger. This left her with bit of spasticity bit more affecting the left leg and the right leg. She reports that she more or less led a normal life and was reasonably active. She did use assistive device occasionally a cane or more likely a crutch. She developed significant arthritis in her left knee. She ultimately had a corticosteroid injection with that knee and became septic with methicillin-resistant Staph aureus. She was hospitalized which led to long protracted septic state with multiorgan system failure and prolonged ICU stay. This left away with end-stage renal disease and destroyed left knee. During that time, she was non-ambulatory basically for the last 9 months. She developed severe contracture of that knee. Significant pain chondrolysis and spasticity in that leg appeared to get worse somewhere along the way. Now, preventing her from ambulation. We discussed the complexity of the situation on multiple occasions. Her sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were normal. An aspiration was negative. An indium scan, however, showed continued collection of suggestive infection persisting in the metaphyseal segment of the tibia and the femur. We discussed her contracture of her spasticity her nonambulatory status all as being significantly is complicated. She had a previous opinion that suggested of fusion. This certainly would be a suitable operation which would get her leg out straight potentially give her the opportunity to ambulate again. She has quite focused that she wanted to knee replacement. We talked about the issues of persistent infection. We talked about the issues of a contracture. We talked about the spasticity magnifying this as well. I am not entirely sure what her capacity for full extension is. The quadriceps works since she reports that she was more or less straight and ambulatory before this infection. We basically conceded that we would do a 2-staged approach which would involve going into the knee, taking cultures and specimens. We were doing all these soft tissue releases and bone cuts for knee replacement getting the leg out essentially straight in a brace and seeing how she did. Based on this, we could contemplate the potential for our reconstruction as developed quadriceps strength and some propensity to keep her leg out straight. We talked about a variety of other issues. She was adamant that she could not continue along her current course of disability and wheelchair-bound painful status. Ultimately with full consent, appropriate medical clearance, she wished to proceed with the operation on December 20, 2010. SPECIMENS REMOVED: Multiple frozen sections were sent. Cultures were taken from both the femur and the tibia as well as the joint fluid. All of the medial Gram stains and frozen sections were called back as negative for organisms or ketones infection. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATION: After identification of the patient, induction of general anesthetic, the patient was positioned on the table. Bony prominences were appropriately padded. A tourniquet applied to left upper thigh. Left leg was prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion. It should be mentioned that prior to prepping and draping, we did exam under anesthesia. She has a fair amount of Aquinas in both feet. Worse on the right and the left. Her right foot barely comes to neutral. Actually probably 10 degrees plantar flexion and neutral pronation supination type position. With her asleep and paralyzed, her flexion contracture is probably in the neighborhood 50 the 55 degrees and quite solid. She can flex it up to 120 degrees. Her hip would extend off the table to basically neutral. Once the leg was prepped and draped in usual sterile fashion, Esmarch exsanguination was carried out, and the tourniquet was inflated to 300 mmHg. We opened through a standard midline incision, a standard medial parapatellar approach. The entire knee was all soft and scar tissue. We actually looked fairly destroyed. The bone was quite soft. The tissue was very fibrotic. A little bit juicer than dry. Cultures and frozen sections were taken which again were all called back as negative for acute inflammation and negative Gram stains. Additional exposure was gained by elevating the tissue off the proximal medial tibia around the posterior medial corner. Ultimately we would perform a fairly dramatic posterior medial corner. Release all the way across the back of the tibia to release the capsule. The fat pad was resected. The patella was identified. Complete medial and lateral synovectomies were performed to free up the gutters again. The patella was able to be everted. We resected the medial and lateral menisci as well. It was fairly dramatic bone destruction on both the tibia and the femur. We resected the anterior posterior cruciate ligaments. The tibia was subluxed forward and in anteriorly and cut. Ultimately we cut the tibia total 3 times removing conservative initially but ultimately removing some additional bone to make room for the prothesis. Each time, we recut the tibia. We were able to work all around the posterior medial corner, posterior lateral corner freeing up the posterior capsule. We did a fair amount work behind the femur as well. Completely releasing all the scar tissue off the back of the condyle through the notch and up the back of the femur. This gave us basically a full capsular release. Once we had with the tibia cut, we could bring the leg out and just about full extension. We still had a significant amount of balance posteriorly. The drill hole was made in the canal of the femur. We resected 11 mm off the femur. We then continued to do some more additional work. We were out the full extension with the cut bony surfaces but not on the components. We ended up cutting another 3 mm off the distal femur before it is all said and done. We went back and forth in flexion and extension doing more and more releases posteriorly around the medial and lateral side freeing up the iliotibial band, etc. Ultimately, we could get a spacer block in for a 10 mm insert with probably a 10 degree residual balance to the knee. It was felt that this was at least getting in the direction of adequate. The tibia was prepared for 3 prosthesis. The femur was then cut for a 3. We balanced the rotation off the soft tissues. Took very little posterior bone trying to recreate as much flexion space as possible. We dropped the size 3 block the back 2 mm and escaped without notching. Again, we took very little posterior bone. We had mixed a size 3 Sigma mold on the back table with 2 bags of cement, each 1 containing 3 g of vancomycin, 1 g of tobramycin plus 1 g gent per bag for total of 6, 2, and 2. This fit the bone quite nicely. We trialed the metal component and the 10 polyethylene. With this we could get the leg out into extension about probably 10 degrees short. Feeling that this was adequate, the tourniquet was deflated. Hemostasis was achieved. We mixed up two more bags of cement with the same antibiotic mixture. These were allowed to get good and we. We curetted out the metaphysis segment of both the femur and the tibia. The tibial component was cemented into place and compacted into place. The femoral component was cemented into place as well. The leg was brought out into extension. With some work, we were again able to get to that same 10 to 15 degree flexion contracture range. The cement was allowed to completely harden. The wound was copiously irrigated with antibiotic solution. A single drain was placed, and the arthrotomy was closed with 0 Vicryl suture. Subcutaneous tissue was also resurfaced the patella. The size 35 patellar button. The tracking was quite nice although the plan was to the leg to be in full extension. The arthrotomy was closed with 0 Vicryl suture in interrupted fashion. Subcutaneous tissues were reapproximated with 2-0 Vicryl suture. Skin was reapproximated with staples. Sterile dressing was applied as was the brace and 10 degrees of flexion to keep around the full extension, as was the plan. The patient was awakened and transferred to the recovery room in stable. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|