Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-08-2011, 04:25 PM
missbren71 missbren71 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
missbren71 is on a distinguished road
Default steroid induced diabetes

I would like to know how you are coding steroid induced diabetes. I know that it was once coded as 251.8 but with the secondary diabetes section 249 I would think this is what is used. Also using the index takes you to secondary diabetes. I am looking in a study book for 2010 that still says to use 251.8. What are your thoughts? Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-08-2011, 08:37 PM
btadlock1's Avatar
btadlock1 btadlock1 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,505
btadlock1 will become famous soon enough
Default

I have a 2010 Ingenix book at the moment that leads me to 249.0, specifically. Diabetes, steroid induced in the alphabetic directs you to See Diabetes, Secondary, which is associated with 249.0. In the tabular, 249.0 is Secondary diabetes mellitus without mention of complication (or manifestation classifiable to 249.1-249.9):
Secondary diabetes NOS
And there's also a note underneath that says "Drug/chemical induced diabetes mellitus w/o comp", but that may be unique to this ICD-9 publication.

I don't believe that 251.8 gives the indication that the patient has diabetes, or what caused it. Almost every other code in the Other Disorders of Pancreatic Internal Secretion (251) section specifically exclude glycemic conditions associated with diabetes, which makes me think that the section is devoted to non-diabetic diseases that happen to mimic diabetic symptoms, but I could be wrong.

The study books aren't always kept up to date with the code changes - it just depends on when the edition is released. It would be really difficult to update them every year, I suppose. The one I used to study for the CPMA exam was the recommended version until this year, and it still had references to CPT 90772, which changed to 96372 in 2009. Trust your code books. The tests are updated annually.
__________________
Brandi Tadlock, CPC, CPC-P, CPMA, CPCO
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-2011, 07:43 AM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,311
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

Go to the ICD-9 guidelines and the section there on secondary diabetes will tell you to code it as a 249.x code.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm_a...guidelines.htm
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-09-2011, 07:46 PM
missbren71 missbren71 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
missbren71 is on a distinguished road
Default

Thank you. I am studying for my CCS-P and an AHIMA 2010 study guide seems to be very outdated. It concerns me that a study guide to help you prepare would have these simple errors in it. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:15 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC