Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-27-2011, 01:25 PM
Pillow1 Pillow1 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 104
Pillow1 is on a distinguished road
Default J code denials:modifier 59 on 94640?

99214 25 dx: 493.90,466.0,401.9,272.4 = paid
94640 dx: 493.90, 466.0 = paid
j7609 dx: 493.90 = denied c0-97
j7645 dx: 493.90 = denied co-97

should i have billed the 94640 with a 59 modifier?
__________________
Denise
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2011, 02:20 PM
brookievb brookievb is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
brookievb is on a distinguished road
Default

what is the EOB co-97? Not familiar with that one.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2011, 09:47 AM
peanutbutterkisses peanutbutterkisses is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 15
peanutbutterkisses is on a distinguished road
Default

I never bill 94640 with a modifier 59. The E&M visit w/ mod 25 I think is correct.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-01-2011, 01:31 PM
helehcim helehcim is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5
helehcim is on a distinguished road
Default

59 modifier on 94640 will not result in payment for the drugs. The two drugs were denied as CO97, contractual obliagation (meaning don't bill the patient, check your contract) and 97, short version is that it's included in another service. I'm guessing you billed Medicare, and it is my experience that Medicare does not cover those drugs. It is not a coding issue, from what I see the coding is fine (without reviewing the notes, that is)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2011, 01:41 PM
dballard2004 dballard2004 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,143
dballard2004 is on a distinguished road
Default

I'll wager an opinion here.

While the CPT guidelines direct you to report the appropriate code(s) for the medication used with nebulizer treatments, not all payers will reimburse for them. Some payers consider the medication to be inclusive of the nebulizer treatment.

With that being said, modifier 59 would not be appropriate in the above scenario. As the person in the above post stated, without having the notes to look at, the coding appears to be correct. This appears to be a coverage issue with the payer and I would recommend consulting with the payer in question for further guidance.

Hope this helps and again this is my opinion.
__________________
Dawson Ballard, Jr., CPC, CEMC, CPMA, CCS-P
Coder
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-2011, 08:19 PM
Pillow1 Pillow1 is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 104
Pillow1 is on a distinguished road
Default

yes that helps very much.. I will check with Medicare regarding the usage of the J code (denied co 97) and post their response .. thank you all
__________________
Denise
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-09-2011, 11:57 PM
annakilker annakilker is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 29
annakilker is on a distinguished road
Default denial of J codes CO-97

CO-97 is a denial of a procedure because it is included in another procedure (including a global package) however that does not apply in this case.

From what I can gather the ICD code 493.90 is not on the Medicare list of limited coverage diagnosis,. Your documentation would have to support ICD 493.91 or 493.92 (acute condition). 493.90 is unspecified and not on the list.

I also believe you could bill the 96460 twice because two treatments were administered. if the condition was acute I would appeal the claim.

Good luck I hope you can be reimbursed appropriately.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-24-2013, 08:09 AM
annamaria1827 annamaria1827 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 12
annamaria1827 is on a distinguished road
Default

If 94640 was done twice, to the second 94640 should be appended Mod 76.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC