Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Modifiers
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-29-2011, 09:28 AM
rizzo9 rizzo9 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10
rizzo9 is on a distinguished road
Default Modifier 26 59 76 in Pathology

So I am looking for some advice...I recently have been getting claims denied as duplicates and the insurance is telling me to add the 76 modifier.

This is the scenario:

The patient had biopsies performed on the ileum, cecum, colon, rectum, sigmoid and all with the same end result of a polyp. All the specimans are labeled in the gross description to show each individual site.

These were then billed as:

88305 26
88305 26 59
88305 26 59
88305 26 59
88305 26 59

The insurance is now saying that they want the lines billed as:

88305 26
88305 26 59
88305 26 59 76
88305 26 59 76
88305 26 59 76

Is that correct??? I thought that as long as the 59 is on each line then why is there a need for the 76.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-29-2011, 03:06 PM
gailmc's Avatar
gailmc gailmc is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 84
gailmc is on a distinguished road
Default

Since 88305 has a professional component, the -76 modifier is the correct modifier.

Also since the description of 88305 has "unit of service is specimen" in it (at the beginning of the 88300 section in your CPT book) you can bill repeat services in units. Any time the CPT description has a "per" or "each" or designates a unit, we can bill those repeat services using quantity. So for this claim, I would bill 88305 -26 with a quantity of 5.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-30-2011, 12:22 PM
rizzo9 rizzo9 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 10
rizzo9 is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks so much! I wasn't understanding why the insurance was asking for both the 59 and 76 but it makes complete sense for just the 76 modifier to be added. Thank you again for your help!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-24-2011, 07:44 AM
clwhite clwhite is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
clwhite is on a distinguished road
Default

I disagree with the use of modifier 76. Do you have any documentation that supports this? Our editing software says mod 76 is not allowed for 88305 or 88307
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-24-2011, 08:53 PM
dadhich.girish dadhich.girish is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 202
dadhich.girish is on a distinguished road
Default

Nor does EncoderPro allow mod 76 with 88305 and 88307.
__________________
Girish Dadhich, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-24-2011, 09:12 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,292
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

76 is not the correct modifier as this is for a repeat procedure, to be a repeat procedure it is the same procedure repeated in a different setting. That is not the case here. The 59 is the correct modifier, but why the 26? I see a need only for the 59 to indicate a distinct and separate specimen. Per or each is not an indication to use units this means each procedure as in a distinct and separate. Units would not be appropriate in this instance since each specimen is from a distinct and separate site, not multiple specimens from the same site.
If you process the specimen and provide the official interpretation then there is no need for the 26 modifier.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC