Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > General Surgery
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-18-2008, 03:43 PM
tigger8654 tigger8654 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1
tigger8654 is on a distinguished road
Default Assistant Surgeon

Does anyone have anything in writing that states an assistant surgeon needs to do their own documentation of the surgery? Or is it enough that the surgeon states that he was assisted by....

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-18-2008, 03:55 PM
rjconnell rjconnell is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 26
rjconnell is on a distinguished road
Default

Sorry, I wish that I had something written. I work in a teaching facility so ours may be a little different. When I bill for an assistant, the primary dicates the op-report with the statement that he was assisted by ____. Since we are teaching we have to have a separate statement that no qualified resident was available and we use a mod 82. For non-teaching you would probably use an 80. I have not asked my assists to provide any additional documentation the primary op-report should suffice.
__________________
Rachel C. Ashley, CPC-E/M
Houston, TX
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-18-2008, 04:04 PM
FTessaBartels FTessaBartels is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 4,436
FTessaBartels will become famous soon enough
Default Co Surg vs Assist Surg

If the "second" surgeon is truly an assistant - then no separate dictation is required. The primary surgeon merely needs to state "assisted by ____." (and the no qualified resident statemetn if in a teaching hospital). Use -80 or -82 depending on if you're in a teaching hospital setting.

If the "second" surgeon is actually a co-surgeon - then each surgeon must dictate an operative report and you bill the same CPT to both with -62 modifier on both claims.

F Tessa Bartels CPC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-18-2008, 05:15 PM
mmelcam's Avatar
mmelcam mmelcam is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 259
mmelcam is on a distinguished road
Default

I read in a previous issue of General Surgery Coder's Pink Sheet that when using the assistant surgeon modifier, you do not need to dictate your own operative report. You just need to be listed as the assistant surgeon on the primary surgeon's operative report. I don't have access to the issue right now. When I get back to the office, I will let you know which issue it was in.
__________________

Melissa Blow, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-23-2008, 06:34 AM
mmelcam's Avatar
mmelcam mmelcam is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Posts: 259
mmelcam is on a distinguished road
Default

I found the information in the General Surgery Coder's Pink Sheet July 2007, Vol. 6, No. 7 pages 4 - 5. I hope this helps.
__________________

Melissa Blow, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-23-2008, 07:21 AM
RebeccaWoodward* RebeccaWoodward* is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,129
RebeccaWoodward* will become famous soon enough
Default

In addition to listing the assistant surgeons name, our payors require documentation for the need and role of an assistant surgeon. There is an excellent article about this in the January 2008 Coding Edge, page 38. I made a copy of this article for my surgeons and have had excellent results.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-23-2008, 08:15 AM
spirving spirving is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 19
spirving is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FTessaBartels View Post
If the "second" surgeon is actually a co-surgeon - then each surgeon must dictate an operative report and you bill the same CPT to both with -62 modifier on both claims.

F Tessa Bartels CPC
Is there a place I can find documentation supporting this statement? It only makes sense, really. But I am having trouble documenting this to our surgeons & I'm probably going to be opening a big can of worms with this. If there is written documentation somewhere, it would definitely help me along. I'm not finding anything on the CMS or OIG website. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-23-2008, 09:21 AM
RebeccaWoodward* RebeccaWoodward* is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,129
RebeccaWoodward* will become famous soon enough
Default

You're right...I had some difficulty finding this on CMS. I was, however, able to locate something on my local website. Maybe this will be helpful.

Appropriate Use of Modifier -62 for Co-Surgery
Recently, CIGNA Government Services Medical Review found that several providers were incorrectly appending the modifier -62 to every surgical procedure code billed during the same surgical session. The AMA CPT 2001 descriptor for modifier -62 says that "When two surgeons work together as primary surgeons performing distinct part(s) of a single reportable procedure, each surgeon should report his/her distinct operative work by adding the modifier -62 to the single definitive procedure code. Each surgeon should report the co-surgery once using the same procedure code. If additional procedure(s) (including add on procedure(s)) are performed during the same surgical session, separate code(s) may be reported without the modifier -62 added."

There are four guidelines that should be used when billing for co-surgery.

Modifier -62 is for use by two surgeons who work together as primary surgeons.
Modifier -62 should be added to the primary procedure. Each co-surgeon should use modifier -62 only once. It should not be linked to additional codes, including add-on codes.
Each of the co-surgeons may act as an assistant surgeon for additional procedures.
Surgeons of the same or different specialty can use modifier -62, but unlike assistant surgeons, each co-surgeon must dictate a separate operative report documenting his/her distinct operative work. The operative report should indicate the medical necessity for having two surgeons act as co-surgeons.

Look on page 37 on the below link.

http://www.cignagovernmentservices.c...1/101_mod3.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-31-2009, 12:18 PM
RJG RJG is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Green Bay Wisconsin
Posts: 8
RJG is on a distinguished road
Default More questions on assistant documentation

I have a question on this. We were recently told by our State Medical Society that our surgeons should be documenting why they needed an assistant surgeon and what the assistant did. Our surgeons have come back asking exactly what they should be saying. They feel it's obvious why they needed an assistant on a major surgery that allows one and they are wondering exactly what and how much they need to document on what the assistant did. Could someone give us an example of some of the wording they use?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-31-2009, 12:49 PM
LLovett LLovett is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,638
LLovett is on a distinguished road
Default

What we are having our surgeons do is at the beginning of the op report they make a statement like "Due to the complex nature of this procedure, PA John Smith was present and assisted me through out" or whatever the reason is that they have an assistant.

Then in the op report itself we have them identify who did what by using terms like I, we, or the assistants name, such as "I opened...." "We then..." "PA Smith harvested the....".

These are just brief examples but hopefully they will help you.

Laura, CPC
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC