Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Interventional Radiology
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-15-2011, 01:30 PM
cweavercpc cweavercpc is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Jackson, TN
Posts: 59
cweavercpc is on a distinguished road
Default Intervention in Lt leg... cath also placed in RT leg??

I don't know how I have not come across this before... or if I am just having a day that I am questioning myself.

In short we did: RCF access, RCI stent, REI stent, then went contralaterally to the LCI to the the left leg angio... is the LCI cath placement bundled? I know this is a seperate vascular family so my instinct is to bill it but for some reason I am questioning myself.

Please read the below note and let me know your input.

Procedure Detail reads:

RCF access was obtained using modified seldinger technique and 6f introducer sheath was used to cannulate the right common femoral artery. The pigtail catheter was advanced to the distal aorta and distal aortography was performed with the 6f pigtail catheter. Distal aorta has mild disease, giving origin to the right common iliac artery and left common iliac artery.

Left common iliac artery has no disease. Right common iliac artery has 75-80% stenosis. Right external iliac artery has 70% proximal stenosis.

Ath this time I decided to intervene on the right common iliac artery lesion and right external iliac artery lesion. Heparin was given for anticoagualtion. J-wire was advanced across the lesion and a 7 x 56 mm Express LD stent was advacned and deployed at the lesion site up to 14 atmospheres for 45 seconds. The lesion was reduced from 70 to 0%. A 7 x 39mm Express LD stent was advanced and deployed at the lesion of the right external iliac artery. The lesion was reduced to 0%. TIMI-3 flow was established with no complications.

The tip of the pigtail catheter was advanced across the aortoiliac bifurcation. The wire was advanced across the left common iliac artery. Glide catheter was positioned in the left common iliac artery. Selective left common iliac artery angiogram with distal run off was performed. Left common femoral artery has 50% stenosis proximally, giving origin to the left profunda and left SFA. Left SFA has more than 80% stenosis, eccentric lesion - multiple lesions were seen. Left popliteal artery has more than 85% stenosis, very eccentric. Left anterior tibial artey is totally occuluded. Left tibioperoneal trunk has 90% mid stenosis, single vessel run off.

RCF artery angiogram with distal run off was performed. RCF artery has mild disease, giving origin to right profunda and right superficial femoral artery. There appears to be around 70% stenosis at the superficial femoral artery/profunda bifurcation. The rught superficial femoral artery has more than 95% proximal stenosis, diffuse disease otherwise. Right popliteal artery has 50-60% proximal stenosis. Right tibioperoneal trunk has more than 95% stenosis. Only single vessel run off was visualized.

end.

I coded this as:

75625 abd angio
37221 RCI stent
37223 REI stent
36245 LCI cath placement
75716 Bil leg angio

Please let me know what you think about the cath placement in the LCI? Would you bill?
__________________
C. Weaver, CPC, CCC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-15-2011, 02:51 PM
dpeoples dpeoples is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 844
dpeoples is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cweavercpc View Post
I don't know how I have not come across this before... or if I am just having a day that I am questioning myself.

In short we did: RCF access, RCI stent, REI stent, then went contralaterally to the LCI to the the left leg angio... is the LCI cath placement bundled? I know this is a seperate vascular family so my instinct is to bill it but for some reason I am questioning myself.

Please read the below note and let me know your input.

Procedure Detail reads:

RCF access was obtained using modified seldinger technique and 6f introducer sheath was used to cannulate the right common femoral artery. The pigtail catheter was advanced to the distal aorta and distal aortography was performed with the 6f pigtail catheter. Distal aorta has mild disease, giving origin to the right common iliac artery and left common iliac artery.

Left common iliac artery has no disease. Right common iliac artery has 75-80% stenosis. Right external iliac artery has 70% proximal stenosis.

Ath this time I decided to intervene on the right common iliac artery lesion and right external iliac artery lesion. Heparin was given for anticoagualtion. J-wire was advanced across the lesion and a 7 x 56 mm Express LD stent was advacned and deployed at the lesion site up to 14 atmospheres for 45 seconds. The lesion was reduced from 70 to 0%. A 7 x 39mm Express LD stent was advanced and deployed at the lesion of the right external iliac artery. The lesion was reduced to 0%. TIMI-3 flow was established with no complications.

The tip of the pigtail catheter was advanced across the aortoiliac bifurcation. The wire was advanced across the left common iliac artery. Glide catheter was positioned in the left common iliac artery. Selective left common iliac artery angiogram with distal run off was performed. Left common femoral artery has 50% stenosis proximally, giving origin to the left profunda and left SFA. Left SFA has more than 80% stenosis, eccentric lesion - multiple lesions were seen. Left popliteal artery has more than 85% stenosis, very eccentric. Left anterior tibial artey is totally occuluded. Left tibioperoneal trunk has 90% mid stenosis, single vessel run off.

RCF artery angiogram with distal run off was performed. RCF artery has mild disease, giving origin to right profunda and right superficial femoral artery. There appears to be around 70% stenosis at the superficial femoral artery/profunda bifurcation. The rught superficial femoral artery has more than 95% proximal stenosis, diffuse disease otherwise. Right popliteal artery has 50-60% proximal stenosis. Right tibioperoneal trunk has more than 95% stenosis. Only single vessel run off was visualized.

end.

I coded this as:

75625 abd angio
37221 RCI stent
37223 REI stent
36245 LCI cath placement
75716 Bil leg angio

Please let me know what you think about the cath placement in the LCI? Would you bill?
yes, code 36245 with a 59 modifier. I agree with the other codes as well except the
75625. I don't see enough documentation (interpretation) for an abdominal angiography, nor do I see medical necessity.

HTH
__________________
Danny L. Peoples
CIRCC,CPC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-15-2011, 03:08 PM
cweavercpc cweavercpc is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Jackson, TN
Posts: 59
cweavercpc is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks Danny! I agree the abd angio findings is lacking and the cath placement for it should have been better documented.

I appreciate your help!
__________________
C. Weaver, CPC, CCC
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC