Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > OB/GYN
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-04-2011, 06:59 AM
thera.white@osumc.edu thera.white@osumc.edu is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbus
Posts: 4
thera.white@osumc.edu is on a distinguished road
Default Failed Essure

I have a Dr that did a laparoscopic removal of an essure coil because it perforated the tube does anyone know the correct cpt code to use?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2011, 02:19 PM
preserene preserene is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 993
preserene is on a distinguished road
Default

49325 with removal of intraluminal obstructive material (here it is Essure coil in the lumen of fallopian tube) which is obsructing the lumen of FT- a sort of an obstructing foreign body (thouhg it was an intentional placement before). And an appropriate ICD code.

I even thoght of the Essure was removed with a hysteroscope then code 58562 or else 57415, along with this use 996.32, a post procedural complication code and E947.9 .
But these Cpt codes are not appropriate for Laparoscopic which is the main stay procedure here.

Last edited by preserene; 08-12-2011 at 02:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2011, 01:00 PM
smmilen smmilen is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 21
smmilen is on a distinguished road
Default

Reviewing the CPT Assistant Archive from March 2000 which covered changes to laparacopy codes, I think I'd be inclined to go with 58562. The laparacopic/endoscopic bit would be considered integral the way interpret the guidelines. I'd love to know what other folks think though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2011, 05:24 PM
preserene preserene is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 993
preserene is on a distinguished road
Default

Laparoscopy is abdominal approach and hysteroscopy is essentially vaginal approach and it cannot be used abdominally. Hysteroscopy do not involve invasive(INCISIONAL OR BREAKTHROUGH)) approach nor producing pneumoperironeum like installation which are invasive.
Will the endocsopy rule obliterate the importance of approach and the route of entry in OBGYN?
I understand and it makes sense when we use the laparoscopic approach for DeVanci procdures because the code are not yet available for it an dithe approach as well as invasiveness
Could any one validate authentically with references for the lap, codes being used in the place of hysteroscopic procedures for reasons of nonavailability of code and vice versa, please?

Last edited by preserene; 08-16-2011 at 05:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:04 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC