Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Outpatient Facilities

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-14-2008, 01:56 PM
coderguy1939 coderguy1939 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 605
coderguy1939 is on a distinguished road
Default Cataract extraction w/lensectomy & pars plana vitrectomy

Prior to surgery, the doctor discussed with the patient that there might be some compromise to the posterior capsule and that vitrectomy and lensectomy might be necessary. During phaco the lens nucleus migrated posteriorly. The doctor finished the phaco, then performed phaco-fragmentation of the lens nucleus (66850) and a pars plana vitrectomy (67036). Since this was discussed with the patient preoperatively, can all of these procedures be coded together?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-19-2008, 11:11 AM
mbort's Avatar
mbort mbort is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ENGLEWOOD/DENVER
Posts: 2,332
mbort is on a distinguished road
Default

If the prolasped vitreous exists and is known in advance (documented in the patients medical record) it is not considered a complication of the cataract surgery. Therefore the physican who plans to perform a vitrectomy during the same operative session of cataract surgery could separately code for the vitrectomy using the 59 modiifer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-21-2008, 08:53 AM
coderguy1939 coderguy1939 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 605
coderguy1939 is on a distinguished road
Default

There was no prolapsed vitreous documented preoperatively, just a suspicion that there might be some "posterior capsular compromise" which was discussed with the patient along with the possibility of the additional procedures. What the doctor suspected occurred during surgery. Can the lensectomy and vitrectomy be coded? What the doctor suspected seems to be something that may occur during any cataract surgery.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-21-2008, 09:07 AM
mbort's Avatar
mbort mbort is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ENGLEWOOD/DENVER
Posts: 2,332
mbort is on a distinguished road
Default

I would say yes simply because he did anticipate (suspect) the possibility of the additional procedure prior to surgery and its documented.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-21-2008, 09:49 AM
coderguy1939 coderguy1939 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 605
coderguy1939 is on a distinguished road
Default

THanks for your help.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2011, AAPCAd Management plugin by RedTyger