Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Billing/Reimbursement
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-26-2011, 02:26 PM
dballard2004 dballard2004 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,143
dballard2004 is on a distinguished road
Default Billing All Mid-Level Providers Under the DOC

This may sound like a ridiculous question to some of you, but this has become a dilema with my organization and I need guidance, please.

In terms of billing, I understand that there are some payers out there that will not credential or recongize a mid-level provider and in order to report those services we have to bill under the supervising physican and append the modifier SA so the payer will process the claim correctly and the carrier will reimburse at the correct level (usually 85%). Now the problem, my organization is asking if we can apply this methodology to all mid-level providers. Meaning can we bill all mid-level providers under the supervising physican and append the SA modifier across the board, or do would we open ourselves up to potential denials? Legalities? We do understand that Medicare does not accept the SA modifier. My understanding of the reimbursement process is that if the provider is credentialed with the payer and has his/her own number, you are to bill that provider under his/her own number.

So, can anyone advise me on this issue, please? I think we can't do this across the board, but I am getting pushback. All thoughts appreciated.
__________________
Dawson Ballard, Jr., CPC, CEMC, CPMA, CCS-P
Coder

Last edited by dballard2004; 08-26-2011 at 02:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-26-2011, 03:14 PM
btadlock1's Avatar
btadlock1 btadlock1 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,505
btadlock1 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dballard2004 View Post
This may sound like a ridiculous question to some of you, but this has become a dilema with my organization and I need guidance, please.

In terms of billing, I understand that there are some payers out there that will not credential or recongize a mid-level provider and in order to report those services we have to bill under the supervising physican and append the modifier SA so the payer will process the claim correctly and the carrier will reimburse at the correct level (usually 85%). Now the problem, my organization is asking if we can apply this methodology to all mid-level providers. Meaning can we bill all mid-level providers under the supervising physican and append the SA modifier across the board, or do would we open ourselves up to potential denials? Legalities? We do understand that Medicare does not accept the SA modifier. My understanding of the reimbursement process is that if the provider is credentialed with the payer and has his/her own number, you are to bill that provider under his/her own number.

So, can anyone advise me on this issue, please? I think we can't do this across the board, but I am getting pushback. All thoughts appreciated.
I believe that you can, because they are considered an employee of the physician. It's not considered pass-through billing, in that situation, but you should still check with your major payors individually to make sure they don't have any other criteria that has to be satisfied, or any restrictions. It's a better practice to bill them under their own info, though, when possible - if you're dependent on the SA modifier, what do you plan to do with patients who are double covered, with Medicare as a secondary payor? How about the ones who 'forget' to give you their COB information until after you've submitted a claim? Also, it does add a degree of liability to the supervising physician, since their name gets attached to everything that goes out the door. More claims means more chances for errors, and a higher probability of becoming the target of an audit. Even if you've got no reason to be concerned, why expose yourself to the hassle?
__________________
Brandi Tadlock, CPC, CPC-P, CPMA, CPCO
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-26-2011, 03:20 PM
Theresa Reimann Theresa Reimann is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2
Theresa Reimann is on a distinguished road
Default Billing All Mid-Level Providers Under the DOC

Duble check with your reps and send out a few samples
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-26-2011, 03:30 PM
btadlock1's Avatar
btadlock1 btadlock1 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,505
btadlock1 will become famous soon enough
Default

You may want to check this out, too: http://www.physiciansnews.com/2010/0...iability-risk/
__________________
Brandi Tadlock, CPC, CPC-P, CPMA, CPCO
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-29-2011, 09:20 AM
dballard2004 dballard2004 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,143
dballard2004 is on a distinguished road
Default

My thanks to both of you! This is very helpful!
__________________
Dawson Ballard, Jr., CPC, CEMC, CPMA, CCS-P
Coder
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC