|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
We have been getting denials from Medicare for the ICD-9 codes 600.01 (BPH w/obstruction) and 185 (prostate cancer) due to not being coded to highest level of specificity. Does anyone have any ideas on this?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I haven't seen a denial like that, but 600.01 has a note to add the urinary symptom (788.XX). Would that help?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Your 185 is fine I am not sure what the problem could be there, you should appeal with a copy of the page out of the code book. Th 600.01 does require a secondary code for the symptom so that should fix it just fine. Is there any additional information you can supply?
__________________
Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
You may need to review any current LCDs if those dx are attached to procedures. If E&M you should not need any other dx. Sometimes Medicare has bad batch runs and a simple call to customer service will help get the claim to reprocess correctly.
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Shaana H
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why would you report the code 600.01 for benign hypertrophy of the prostate and then apply the code 185 for prostate cancer? If a patient has prostate cancer with obstruction you should report the cancer and the urinary obstruction code 599.69.
__________________
Shelly Cronin, CPC, CPMA, CANPC, CGSC, CGIC AAPC CEU Vendor Department Manager |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
These denials were on separate patients and claims. The two codes weren't used together.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
It depends on what you're trying to bill. If you are billing a residual ultrasound, for example, those diagnoses will not work.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|