Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Orthopaedics
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-28-2008, 02:31 PM
ddupps ddupps is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
ddupps is on a distinguished road
Default Lisfranc dislocation -28615

Do you code 28615 open treatment of tarsometatarsal joint dislocation per joint that is reduced or 1 time no matter how many joints are reduced?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-28-2008, 03:34 PM
mbort's Avatar
mbort mbort is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ENGLEWOOD/DENVER
Posts: 2,333
mbort is on a distinguished road
Default

by each metatarsal (per joint) that is dislocated/reduced
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2008, 04:29 PM
thythaot thythaot is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 20
thythaot is on a distinguished road
Smile CPC-A New

Hi ,
I agree with mbort, this is for more information about this. I hope it might help.
Based on December 2003 Bulletin by Margie Scally Vaught CPC, CCS-P, MCS-P reviewd by Walter J. Pedowitz, MD. said:
The mechanism of the injury causes the tarsal bones to dislocate with or without resulting metatarsal (MT) fractures. Many times, both the dislocation and the fracture are treated separately with stabilization devices, which can be closed, percutaneous or open. Separately coding for the fixation of the metatarsal fractures could depend on the location of those fractures. Lisfranc dislocation can be for one or many of the tarsometatarsal joints. The open reduction code is for each joint that is reduced in an open fashion. Here are some example
Tarsometatarsal dislocation of the right midfoot along with mid-shaft fractures of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th MTs: The dislocation is treated by open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The MT fractures are also treated by ORIF by separate incisions. CPT code 28615 would be reported for the fixation of the dislocation. CPT code 28485-59 would be reported three times to represent each metatarsal fracture, per CPT description of the code. Modifier T, per CPT, would not be appropriate for these metatarsal shaft fractures.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2008, 09:56 AM
nikkisgranny nikkisgranny is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 141
nikkisgranny is on a distinguished road
Default

Coding both 28485 and 28615, I have had two instances now where UHC only pays for one of each service regardless of how many joints are dislocated. I do not know what I am doing wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-03-2008, 11:43 AM
mbort's Avatar
mbort mbort is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ENGLEWOOD/DENVER
Posts: 2,333
mbort is on a distinguished road
Default

be sure you are appending the -59 modifier to the line items subsequent to the 1st one. If you are already doing this, I would definitely appeal with the op note showing the different joints highlighted for them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC