Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Diagnosis Coding
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-16-2011, 12:57 PM
smontague smontague is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lebanon, NH
Posts: 27
smontague is on a distinguished road
Question Drug Screen Diagnosis Coding


Need assistance -- we currently use in-house urine drug screens to follow our patients who are being prescribed medications for long-term/chronic problems. Currently we have been coding these we (305.92 - drug abuse, episodic) but don't feel that this is the most appropriate, because they aren't necessarily "abusing" the medication. The only "drug-screening" code that I was able to locate is the "drug screening in athletes".

Our thought was to change to a dual-diagnosis coding system, where we would code the drug dependence (i.e. opiate dependence) and then code the reason for the drug use (i.e. ADD, chronic pain, etc.)

Does anyone else do anything similar to this. Looking for ideas or suggestions. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2011, 01:58 PM
SAPERRINE SAPERRINE is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
SAPERRINE is on a distinguished road
Default

Try using V58.69
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2011, 02:07 PM
smontague smontague is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lebanon, NH
Posts: 27
smontague is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks, hadn't thought of that...we use the v58.61 for our coumadin patients, so this makes perfect sense. Thanks again!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2011, 05:23 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,327
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

Actually V58.69 is a secondary only dx code as it is a status indicator only and does not convey the reason for the encounter if the test is being performed because the patient is on medication then it is not a screening it is a drug monitoring encounter so it sould be coded as V58.83 with a secondary code of the V58.69. Same is true for the coumadin. See coding clinic 4th quarter 2003 and 1st q 2004 I believe.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-21-2011, 07:55 PM
angesmith94 angesmith94 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Burlington, MA
Posts: 7
angesmith94 is on a distinguished road
Default

try v5883 for med. monitoring and v5869 for long term therapeutic meds.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-07-2012, 03:45 AM
anuja.devasthali's Avatar
anuja.devasthali anuja.devasthali is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somers Point New Jersey
Posts: 52
anuja.devasthali is on a distinguished road
Unhappy Urine Drug screen Dx

Even we are confused what Dx should we codes with G0434. As per Medicare LCD guidelines " Report monitoring of patients on methadone maintenance and monitoring of chronic pain patients with opioid dependence suspected of abusing other illicit drugs, using V58.69 as the primary diagnosis."

From this statement it is clear that V58.69 can be used as primary Dx for urine drug screen. We did the same ( used V58.69 as primary diagnosis ) but the claim got denied stating need additional diagnosis. Even V58.83 won't work.
We can not use 304.00 ( Opioid dependence / Methadone dependence ) as V58.69 excludes it.
Should we use V71.81 ( Observation and evaluation for other specified suspected Abuse and neglect ) as secondary code ?
Can someone suggest ?
__________________
Cute Anuja, CPC

"You will not have time to worry about tomorrow if you are busy doing what is to be done today"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-07-2012, 06:40 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,327
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

no you do not use a 304.x nor the V71.81, it is med monitoring , I have always used V58.83 followed by V58.69 with 338.29 third and I have never had any problem.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-08-2012, 11:51 AM
elizabeth24 elizabeth24 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 62
elizabeth24 is on a distinguished road
Default

We use the diagnosis for the reason for the drug use, such as chronic pain syndrome, back pain, etc. followed by V58.69 and have never had any problems.

We never use V58.83 prior to the codes for V58.69 or V58.61 -- is this incorrect?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC