Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Modifiers
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-12-2012, 02:02 PM
nancy.anselmo@ccrheart.com nancy.anselmo@ccrheart.com is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 145
nancy.anselmo@ccrheart.com is on a distinguished road
Default Billing modifier 59

Scenerio: Pt comes to see the Dr for an office visit/EKG so I bill
99214-25
93000-59
Dr then decides to put a holter on the pt so on a seperate claim I bill
93224 all of this is for the same DOS.
Now the insurance denies the 93000 as incidential to the other procedure and I called the Provider rep for this ins and she says that w/59 modifier it will deny w/o clinical notes. Is this billed correctly or not? Thank You Nancy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-12-2012, 02:25 PM
syllingk syllingk is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 277
syllingk is on a distinguished road
Default

well neither of those procedures have any global days listed. They are XXX so you shouldn't have needed a -25. As for the -59, the 93000 is a component of column one code 93224 but a modifier is allowed to differentiate so it looks like it should be paid
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2012, 10:00 PM
tobieforte tobieforte is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 24
tobieforte is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi,

You were right to put the 25 mod on the E/M charge. If not, it would have been denied since they were done on the same date of service. Did you apply the 59 modifier to the procedure that pays the least?? This may be your problem. The 59 mod should be on the procedure that pays the least no matter which came first. This always works for me. Hope this helps you.
__________________
Thanks, Tobie
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-14-2012, 10:42 PM
mitchellde's Avatar
mitchellde mitchellde is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 8,327
mitchellde will become famous soon enoughmitchellde will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tobieforte View Post
Hi,

You were right to put the 25 mod on the E/M charge. If not, it would have been denied since they were done on the same date of service. Did you apply the 59 modifier to the procedure that pays the least?? This may be your problem. The 59 mod should be on the procedure that pays the least no matter which came first. This always works for me. Hope this helps you.
the 59 does not necessarily go on the procedure that pays the least it goes on the column 2 procedure, not always is that the least paying.
__________________

Debra A. Mitchell, MSPH, CPC-H
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-17-2012, 02:04 PM
amym amym is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 225
amym is on a distinguished road
Default

But what is the reasoning behind adding a -59 modifier to the EKG? Just because it was peformed seperately from holter?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-17-2012, 05:19 PM
agaluski agaluski is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
agaluski is on a distinguished road
Default

I run into this scenario a lot in my office. If the patient is scheduled in the office for an OV and an EKG is required, lets say for instance because the patient has CAD and the EKG is done and shows a new arrhythmia or the patient has a new complaint such as palpitations and the MD decides to put a holter on the patient, I would bill the following:

99214 Prim dx CAD
93224 Prim dx AFib
93000-59 Prim dx CAD

The trick is knowing why each was performed. You do not need to put a modifier on the visit. The biggest thing is billing the correct primary diagnosis for each procedure that was performed. As long as you had a reason to perform the initial EKG and something else occured after that led to the Holter being applied just bill the correct primary diagnosis for each and you should not have an issue getting paid. If there was not a seperate diagnosis for the EKG and Holter than I would bill them both just as I did above and then appeal the denial explaining why the patient had it done. The reason payors want you to not bill the EKG and Holter together is because the Holter is considered the "higher" service as it is a "continuous EKG" persay. That is why you have to put a modifier on the EKG if the situation warrants it. Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-18-2012, 07:51 AM
nancy.anselmo@ccrheart.com nancy.anselmo@ccrheart.com is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 145
nancy.anselmo@ccrheart.com is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for your help!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC