Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-25-2012, 12:56 PM
lorabelk lorabelk is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
lorabelk is on a distinguished road
Smile Has anyone had to code Neurogenic Shock?

It is a real diagnosis, however not listed in I9 or I10. 785.59??
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-26-2012, 02:31 PM
AthensCoder AthensCoder is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 65
AthensCoder is on a distinguished road
Default

This is what I found of the condition:
Neurogenic shock is a distributive type of shock resulting in hypotension, occasionally with bradycardia, that is attributed to the disruption of the autonomic pathways within the spinal cord. Hypotension occurs due to decreased systemic vascular resistance resulting in pooling of blood within the extremities lacking sympathetic tone. Bradycardia results from unopposed vagal activity and has been found to be exacerbated by hypoxia and endobronchial suction.[1] Neurogenic shock can result from severe central nervous system damage (brain injury, cervical or high thoracic spinal cord).[2] In more simple terms: the trauma causes a sudden loss of background sympathetic stimulation to the blood vessels. This causes them to relax (vasodilation)[3] resulting in a sudden decrease in blood pressure (secondary to a decrease in peripheral vascular resistance).

Neurogenic shock can be a potentially devastating complication, leading to organ dysfunction and death if not promptly recognized and treated. It is not to be confused with spinal shock, which is not circulatory in nature.

Thus this is a circulatory condition and ICD-9 directs you to code 785.59, so ye you are correct.
__________________
Sonja Little, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-27-2012, 11:09 AM
lorabelk lorabelk is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
lorabelk is on a distinguished road
Default Sonja, You're the best!

The MD listed Neurogenic shock first and then cardiogenic shock, an outside auditor wanted to delet the neurogenic shock but the MD would not change his diagnosis summary (which is good!). So I wanted to use the 785.59. I'll send in the appeal and stick to my guns!!
Thanks again,
Lora B.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC