Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Orthopaedics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-02-2012, 08:10 AM
lfisher@imdsinc.com lfisher@imdsinc.com is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 24
lfisher@imdsinc.com is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Spinal Surgery stuck in Zirmed...HELP!!!!!!!!!!



I have a claim that has been stuck in Zirmed for a couple months. Service date is 9/2011..
the following procedures were billed;
63047- m80 m22
63048-m80 m22
63030-m80 m22 m50
63035-m80 m22

error; 310 THE INDICATED CODE SHOULD NOT BE ON THIS CLAIM WITH ONE OF THE OTHER PROCEDURES. CODE IS INCLUDED AS AN INCLUSIVE COMPONENT OF THE PRIMARY PROCEDURE. 20110920 20110920 63030 80 22 21 1 001 0563500

I have billed with M59 and without because the primary ins paid it without the 59 the secondary is BCBS (Ms)...

Any idea what I am doing wrong??????? Would love to get this paid!

Thank you for any help or suggestions!

Lisa Fisher, CPC
VP AAPC Mobile, AL Chapter
IMDS Inc. Daphne, AL
251-621-6478
lfisher@imdsinc.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-02-2012, 08:53 AM
ckirkp1 ckirkp1 is offline
Networker
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 58
ckirkp1 is on a distinguished road
Default

I have found this article and hopefully it will be helpful to you.
http://www.supercoder.com/articles/a...laminectomies/
But billing both 63047 and 63030 I'm surprise you have recvd paymt because more than likely it will get denied by many ins. as you mentioned its inclusive. But hope this articles helps.

I also found this article as well that may be helpful.
http://www.supercoder.com/articles/a...crodiskectomy/
As long as they are done at different levels. Both codes may be billed together.

Last edited by ckirkp1; 02-03-2012 at 08:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-06-2012, 09:39 AM
lfisher@imdsinc.com lfisher@imdsinc.com is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 24
lfisher@imdsinc.com is on a distinguished road
Default

THANK YOU ZIRMED!!! Amy, a representative with Zirmed called me first thing this morning and wanted to help get this issue resolved. She contacted BCBS and was able to get them to tell us what needed to be done. Looks like the only problem that we had was the M59 should have been the first modifier that we listed. We corrected and resubmitted. Thanks again the the quick response and help from Zirmed!!

Lisa Fisher, CPC
IMDS Inc.
251-621-6478
lfisher@imdsinc.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:57 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2011, AAPCAd Management plugin by RedTyger