Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Orthopaedics
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-06-2012, 02:23 PM
ccarroll ccarroll is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
ccarroll is on a distinguished road
Default claviculectomy

I am trying to find documentation that will either confirm or deny that a minimum of 8 to 10mm of bone must be documented to correctly bill for codes 29824 or 23120. All of my coding resources state that these amounts must be documented to bill these codes, however I am being met with some opposition. Does anyone know the answer? Does anyone know where I can find documentation to support either position?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-2012, 04:28 PM
JMeggett JMeggett is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 226
JMeggett is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccarroll View Post
I am trying to find documentation that will either confirm or deny that a minimum of 8 to 10mm of bone must be documented to correctly bill for codes 29824 or 23120. All of my coding resources state that these amounts must be documented to bill these codes, however I am being met with some opposition. Does anyone know the answer? Does anyone know where I can find documentation to support either position?
AAOS removed their reference to size in their CodeX in 2010. They are the ones that said 8-10mm of bone must be removed to qualify for 29824, but as of 2011 CodeX that is no longer in their description for this procedure. So...you are correct it used to be that way...and it's still a general good rule of thumb to go by, but no longer can be used by insurances to deny the procedure if less than 8mm is removed.

Jenna
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-09-2012, 06:50 AM
Jamie Dezenzo Jamie Dezenzo is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 790
Jamie Dezenzo is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks and good to know :-)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-09-2012, 07:30 AM
ccarroll ccarroll is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
ccarroll is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for your response.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-09-2012, 07:47 AM
ccarroll ccarroll is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
ccarroll is on a distinguished road
Default

One more thing, do you know how I can obtain documentation from the AAOS to support the code description change that you are talking about. Every on line search I do gives me the same code description that I already have stating 8 to 10 mm must be documented.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:28 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC