Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Anesthesia
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-13-2008, 06:47 PM
jdrueppel jdrueppel is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 435
jdrueppel is on a distinguished road
Default "Separate Procedure" distinction

Does anyone have any insight or advise on "separate procedure" distinction codes. For example, a surgeon performs an inguinal hernia (49505) but also performs excision spermatic cord lipoma (55520). Because these are via the same incision the surgeon is billing for the highest surgically valued procedure 49505 but for anesthesia purposes 55520 has highest value.

I don't know if I'm overthinking this case but since it's a two unit differential I'd like other anesthesia coder's opinions. Do you feel it is appropriate to bill the 55520/00860 for the anesthesia service in keeping with the ASA Billing Guideline of reporting the code with the highest base unit value?

Thanks.
Julie Drueppel, CPC

Last edited by jdrueppel; 10-13-2008 at 09:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2008, 01:37 PM
hgolfos hgolfos is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 180
hgolfos is on a distinguished road
Default Separate Procedures

Julie,

It is absolutely appropriate for you to bill the procedure with the highest base value regardless of how the surgeon is billing. The way that I think of it is that our docs are providing anesthesia for all of the procedures during the operating session, so any of them are billable from our standpoint. We should always choose the code with the highest base value in order to maximize our reimbursement. Additionally, when I have two different procedures with the same number of units I always choose the one for which I have the best diagnosis.

Hope this helps.

Heather G. CPC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2008, 07:14 PM
jdrueppel jdrueppel is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 435
jdrueppel is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks Heather!

Julie, CPC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-21-2008, 04:19 PM
LGillstrom's Avatar
LGillstrom LGillstrom is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 17
LGillstrom is on a distinguished road
Default

Heather,

A great way to explain something that seems at face value to go directly against the grain of not "coding for dollars"!

And Julie,

Heather hit the nail on the head!
__________________
Lisa S. Gillstrom, CPC, HUC
National Compliance Manager
KForceHealthcare
813-552-1626
lgillstrom@kforce.com
www.kforce.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC