Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-01-2013, 11:13 AM
jgparrishjr jgparrishjr is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
jgparrishjr is on a distinguished road
Arrow Denial For 99212-25

I received a Denial from Superior Health Plan. This was a ThSteps Exam along with an office visit. 99393-AM with V20.2. 99212-25 with 477.9. 99212 was denied because :"PROCEDURE CODE UNBUNDLED FROM GLOBAL PROCEDURE CODE". Cannot figure why that is? I am a new coder, if you can help me out with this?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2013, 07:24 AM
Marybeth Marybeth is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
Marybeth is on a distinguished road
Default

I do not see anything that is incorrect in your coding. The only thing would be if your pt had any type of procedure during the previous 90 days that would have a global - if so then you would have to add a mod to your e/m to get it paid if it had nothing to do with that procedure
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2013, 01:26 PM
dclark7 dclark7 is offline
True Blue
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 513
dclark7 will become famous soon enough
Default

An exam has to be "significant, separately identifiable" to use the 25 modifier. Verify with your provider relations, the insurance may not consider the work done for a 99212 to be significant or separate. Even CPT states that the problem has to be significant enough to require additional work to perform the key components of a problem oriented E/M. CPT also states that an insignificant or trivial problem.....that does not require additional work up should not be reported. Check the documentation, was a separate exam done, were tests ordered? If the work for th
__________________
Doreen Clark, CPC, CPMA
Medical Auditing Specialist
Integrated Physicians Management Services
East Harftord. Ct
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-18-2013, 07:43 AM
kellysalerno138 kellysalerno138 is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 5
kellysalerno138 is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi, I deal with SHP all the time and 477.9 is not a justifible dual visit. You add it on with the Preventative visit. There is usually not enough documentation outside of the WCC to justify a seperate visit. Allergic Rhinitis: Bill dual if Lab work/s[ecimen or referral is needed of significant counseling is done.

An insignificant or trival problem or abnormality that is encountered in the process of performing the Preventative medicine Evaluation which does not require add'l work and performance of the key components of a problem-oriented E/M should not be reported.

The key to adding an E/M service to the preventative visit is the significance of the problem, the amount of work required to deal with the problem and how clearly it is documented in the pt's chart.
__________________
Kelly L Salerno, CPC
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC