Go Back   AAPC Medical Coding & Billing Forums > Medical Coding > Cardiology
Forum Rules FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-07-2008, 08:32 AM
aopicka aopicka is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
aopicka is on a distinguished road
Question 93000 and 93040

Hello All,
I work for a primary care office and we recently hired a new doctor. She has advised that her old practice would bill both the 93000 (EKG with interpretation and report) and the 93040 rhythem ECG.
These two codes are being used when a patient presents with chest pain and a EKG is done, the provider notices an abnomality and wants to see more of the heart rythem (3 sheets are produced and interpreted)
Has anyone had any luck with billing both of these codes out. I have received a deinal stating the 93040 was part of the 93000. Is there a modifier I am missing?
Documentation shows there was a need to look further.
Thanks for any feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2008, 03:30 PM
dloranger dloranger is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7
dloranger is on a distinguished road
Smile

I wonder what order the doctor is doing these ekg's. Seems like you'd get more info from the 12 lead ekg (93000) then from a 1-3 lead ekg (93040). So my guess would be the 93040 first and then the 93000. Normally, the denial is correct that the 93040 is an intregal part of the 93000. CCI Edits does bundle 93040 into 93000. But it does show that you could use a modifier to override that bundle. So, if they are indeed two separate tests/ekgs, then you could use a 59 modifier.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2008, 10:17 AM
aopicka aopicka is offline
New
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
aopicka is on a distinguished road
Default Thank you

Thank you for your response. This has been driving me insane.
The doc is doing the EKG first and then deciding that they would like a further look at the specfic heart rhythms. The answer I got from the doctor as for the need of both was the rhythm strip (93040) provides 3 pages, and the doc can look at the rhythms for a longer period of time, where as the 93000 only gives one sheet.

Thanks for the info on the bundle and modifier. I will appeal with the appeal and see how this goes.

Again thank you so much


andrea
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-19-2009, 04:13 PM
lupita70 lupita70 is offline
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 23
lupita70 is on a distinguished road
Default

Hi there,

I have a provider that is billing 99285 and 93040 and is being denied as inclusive to E/M. I check CMS CCI edits and I dont see anything that will deny that?

Can you assist me?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Disclaimer: Although AAPC staff members will monitor these forums periodically, we cannot be responsible for the information posted herein, nor guarantee its accuracy. Our members may discuss various subjects related to medical coding, but none of the information should replace the independent judgment of a physician for any given health issue. Please note that the opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of AAPC.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 AM.

AAPC - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2014, AAPC