New vs. Established: Brush Up on the Basics
- By Michelle Dick
- In Billing
- May 1, 2014
- Comments Off on New vs. Established: Brush Up on the Basics
Understand new and established patient requirements and how to apply them.
By G.J. Verhovshek, MA, CPC
Most professional coders—even relative beginners—are familiar with the “three-year rule” to determine whether a patient is new or established with a provider. But that familiar rule has a few wrinkles that make determining patient status more complex than you might realize. Even when using the handy Decision Tree for New vs Established Patients in the CPT® codebook’s Evaluation and Management (E/M) Services Guidelines section, you’ll need to know some additional definitions and details to ensure you make the right designation.
Established Patients Mean Face-to-Face Services
CPT® defines an established patient as meeting several requirements simultaneously. Namely:
An established patient is one who has received a professional service from the physician/qualified health care professional or another physician/qualified health care professional of the exact same specialty and subspecialty who belongs to the same group practice, within the past three years.
The first requirement is that a patient has received a “professional service.” Solely within the context of E/M code selection, CPT® defines a professional service as “those face-to-face services rendered by physicians and other qualified health care professionals who may report evaluation and management services reported by a specific CPT® code(s).”
The important part here is “face-to-face.” Medicare policy (CMS Transmittal R731CP, CR 4032) confirms, “An interpretation of a diagnostic test, reading an x-ray or EKG etc., in the absence of an E/M service or other face-to-face service with the patient does not affect the designation of a new patient.”
A patient would still be new, for instance, if the physician interpreted test results for the patient two years earlier, but had not provided the patient a face-to-face service within the previous three years.
New to Whom?
The second requirement addresses patient status relative to other providers in a group practice. A patient is still new to a provider when another provider within the same group practice has seen the patient within the past three years, but that provider is of a different specialty/subspecialty.
For example, a patient consults with an orthopedist for possible hip replacement. The patient has seen an internist in the same group five times in the past three years. In this case, the patient is established for the internist, but new to the orthopedist.
Resource: For a list of Medicare-recognized physician specialties, visit the CMS website.
The flip side of this requirement is that when a patient becomes established with a physician who works in group practice, the patient is established with all physicians of the same specialty/subspecialty in the group. The American Medical Association (AMA) allows an exception for new physician’s seeing a patient established to the practice for the first time. CPT® Assistant, November 2008, features the following Q&A [emphasis added]:
Question: Can new physicians who come on board to a group practice with their own tax identification numbers charge a new evaluation and management code for patients they see?
Answer: According to CPT guidelines, a new patient is one who has received no professional services from the physician or another physician of the same specialty who belongs to the same group practice within the past three years. Also, if a physician is new to this group practice and had never seen or billed a patient previously through his tax ID number, this should be considered a new patient for the purposes of this physician billing for his evaluation and management service.
Not all payers agree with this logic; investigate your specific payers’ requirements before billing as “new” any patient who is established with another physician of the same specialty/subspecialty within a group.
Established Encompasses Covering Providers, too
If a provider is on call for, or covering for, another provider, a patient’s status is relative to the provider who is unavailable (not the covering provider). For example, Dr. Smith is covering for Dr. Jones, who is on a family vacation. Patients who are established with Dr. Jones would be treated as established with Dr. Smith, even if Dr. Smith has not seen the patient previously.
Likewise, per CPT® guidelines, “When advanced practice nurses and physician assistants are working with physicians, they are considered as working in the exact same specialty and exact same sub-specialties as the physician.”
Patient Status Travels
A common conundrum is how to determine the patient’s status if the provider has seen a patient previously in another location within the past three years. CPT® Assistant (June 1999) explains:
Consider Dr. A, who leaves his group practice in Frankfort, Illinois and joins a new group practice in Rockford, Illinois. When he provides professional services to patients in the Rockford practice, will he report these patients as new or established?
If Dr. A, or another physician of the same specialty in the Rockford practice, has not provided any professional services to that patient within the past three years, then Dr. A would consider the patient a new patient. However, if Dr. A, or another physician of the same specialty in the Rockford practice, has provided any professional service to that patient within the past three years, the patient would then be considered an established patient to Dr. A.
In other words, where the patient is seen doesn’t matter. If the provider treats a patient face-to-face service within the previous three years (in any location), that patient is established (in all locations).
G.J. Verhovshek, MA, CPC, is managing editor at AAPC.
- The Art of Negotiation Starts With an Action Plan - February 1, 2023
- Potential HIPAA Violation Costs Lab $16,500 - January 27, 2023
- OIG: Feds Lack Oversight of Telehealth Services - January 26, 2023
What if a “group” has numerous locations throughout a city? I.e. – The patient was cared for by family medicine in North Dallas but moves to a new provider under the same organization and same specialty (Family Medicine) but different clinic in say… Fort Worth. So different provider, different office, but same parent organization. They are completely “new” to the new clinic.
The patient would still be an established patient, same group/same specialty.
What if I have an oncologist from a private group join a group employed by a health system (new group and tax id)? If some of his patients from private practice follow him to his new group practice would they be considered “new” or “established”. In other words even though he has seen these patients within the past 3 years under the old group would he be able to bill a new patient visit under the new group?
We are a multispecialty clinic with several FPs and just a couple internists. We have always lumped these 2 specialties together when determining whether or not to charge a new patient visit. In other words, if a patient sees an FP and then 1 year later sees an internist, the internist bills an established patient even though they could bill a new patient charge based on the CPT guideline. Is this OK to do? Do you know if this is a common practice?
What about Post Acute Facilities? We have providers that are based at one of our main medical clinics and see patients in SNFs and ALFs. If the patient was seen by one of our medical providers do we still bill a Nursing Facility, Initial if they are then admitted at some point in the course of their treatment?
I have a provider who wants to charge a new patient visit for an established patient who is being seen for a different complaint. I have told her that she cannot do this, but she is adamant that she can – help!!!
The provider CANNOT bill for a new patient visit because of a different complaint unless the patient has NOT been seen by that provider and/or group/practice within the past 3 years. This would be an established patient visit. Hope this helps!
How about if a patient is seen by Neuromuscular (subspecialty) then goes to see a general neurologist in the same group specialty (Neurology) can the neurologist bill for the new patient code?