Staying on Top of ICD-10

Staying on Top of ICD-10

There’s so much legislation popping up regarding ICD-10 implementation, you may be left wondering, What should you do?
Many of us probably like the approach of sticking our heads in the sand and hoping it all goes away. But that these bills are popping up is a sure indication that ICD-10 is truly going to happen. These bills are not aimed at killing ICD-10, they only shed light on where we may be failing and where you should probably put some focus on action plans in your office.
For example, one bill calls for “lack of enforcement” or dual coding for providers during transition. Take a minute to think how that type of approach may effect your practice. At first thought, you probably raise your fist in a cheer, but when you analyze this you quickly begin to understand how this may financially hurt your practice, such as:

  1. Some payers will allow dual coding and some won’t. Can your staff handle the burden of submitting and tracking in two systems? Will they be able to consistently track days in A/R or follow up on claim submissions or resubmissions?
  2. What happens if you submit ICD-9 to one plan only to find out they need ICD-10 because they are not dual capable? Will your PMS system allow you to easily swap out codes? How much staff time to resubmit and research?
  3. If you submit in ICD-9 and others report patients treated in ICD-10, your conditions may not match up and could cause unnecessary record submission or denials and appeals.
  4. With policy changes, patients may qualify quickly under an ICD-10 code where ICD-9 was more vague. This could cause you more staff time to again research  or submit more records.

Another bill calls out for more standardized testing. This is greatly needed (5010 taught us that). When you read this bill it’s a good motivation tool for you to reach out to your payers, and test. If you are too late to test with them, engage in user groups and vendor data to make sure you are covered. If nothing else, be sure to learn from others who have tested.
As we get closer to implementation, more information like this is going to pop up as we jump to get ready. Be sure to stay on top of these and use them as action plans for your practice on areas you may have forgotten.


Rhonda Buckholtz

About Has 38 Posts

Rhonda Buckholtz, CPC, CPMA, CRC, CDEO, CMPE, CHC, COPC, AAPC Approved Instructor, is owner of Coding and Reimbursement Experts. She spends her time helping physician practices achieve operational excellence, compliance, education, and Lean Six Sigma through her consulting. Buckholtz has more than 30 years of experience in healthcare management, compliance, and reimbursement/coding sectors. She was responsible for all ICD-10 training and curriculum at AAPC during the transition from ICD-9. Buckholtz has authored numerous articles for healthcare publications and she has spoken at numerous national conferences for AAPC and others. She is past co-chair for the WEDI ICD-10 Implementation Workgroup, Advanced Payment Models Workgroup, and she provided testimony for ICD-10 and standardization of data for National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Buckholtz is on AAPC’s National Advisory Board.

Comments are closed.