HEALTHCON Regional 2022 | Stay Current. Stay Engaged. | Join today!

State Your Case Against Improper Coding

  • By
  • In Audit
  • September 15, 2015
  • Comments Off on State Your Case Against Improper Coding
State Your Case Against Improper Coding

by John Verhovshek, MA, CPC
What should you do if you are expected to code in a way that you suspect is abusive, or even fraudulent?
First—before you take any action—be clear about what is being asked of you. Misunderstandings happen, and you don’t want to make accusations that you’ll later regret.
Next, research your position. Make sure you have read the code descriptor(s), guidelines, and references correctly. Be certain you understand the appropriate coding, as well as exactly which coding principle is being “broken.”
With the facts by your side, write up a rationale explaining precisely why the current coding practice is wrong. Cite your references. It’s not enough to say, “This is how I learned it.” Provide specific coding references from the CPT® or ICD-9-CM codebooks, the AMA’s CPT Assistant, CMS memoranda, or other authoritative sources. Keep your references nearby, either on paper or accessible online.
If you have a practice compliance plan (and you should), follow it. Not every office has a compliance officer with whom you can address your concerns. In that case, approach your supervisor. Show whomever you meet with your documentation.
You may find out, despite your research, that you’ve misunderstood the situation. Or, maybe your appropriate input is ignored. In the latter case, you will face the difficult decision of whether you should find other employment, or — if you’ve exhausted all other possibilities — whether you should “blow the whistle” on your employer. These are not decisions to be taken lightly, and you must be sure you are prepared to give as much detail as possible. For example:

  • Describe the exact abusive or fraudulent practice/act
  • Identify the responsible individuals and the payers involved
  • Provide an estimate of the money value of the violations, if possible (how often does the violation occur, and what are the financial ramifications in each case?)
  • Reveal the specific information that led you to conclude violations were occurring

Remember: The AAPC Code of Ethics holds members to a higher standard of conduct and professionalism. This means working with your employer, whenever possible, to correct problems, and encouraging those with whom you work to self-report actions that may lead to improper payments. Voluntary compliance is not only the most ethical decision but, in the end, the least costly, as well.

John Verhovshek
Latest posts by John Verhovshek (see all)

About Has 573 Posts

John Verhovshek, MA, CPC, is a contributing editor at AAPC. He has been covering medical coding and billing, healthcare policy, and the business of medicine since 1999. He is an alumnus of York College of Pennsylvania and Clemson University.

No Responses to “State Your Case Against Improper Coding”

  1. cheryl says:

    when a physician purposely avoids the proper code 37193 removal of inferior vena cava. omits from all medical records. in order to protect Coom Medical as a reported defective device of IVC filter . my records are filed with 902.10 45.89 996.74 996.1 anything but what it was removal fractured IVC filter. this way in cross referencing the procudure is not sourced as a defective device or even reoirted at all to FDA Complaints fall on deaf ears I am at the end of trying to peruse this ordeal.. more exhausting than the open surgery to get the thing out of me.
    they win.. vascular team at USC Keck Medicine