Last Day! 35% off Certification Training + Scholarship | Learn More

Reinforce Knee Arthroscopy Coding

Reinforce Knee Arthroscopy Coding

Proper payment relies on a solid understanding of the guidelines.

Many physicians and coders are confused by the differences among CPT® definitions, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Global Service guidelines, and Medicare’s National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) guidelines and procedure-to-procedure edits affecting arthroscopic knee CPT® codes. There also is confusion about when modifier 59 Distinct procedural service is required under each set of guidelines; how the rules apply to Medicare vs. non-Medicare claims; and the impact of the X {EPSU} modifiers introduced in 2015. This article clarifies those differences and answers common questions.

Meniscectomy and Meniscal Repairs

29880 Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with meniscectomy (medial AND lateral, including any meniscal shaving) including debridement/shaving of articular cartilage (chondroplasty), same or separate compartment(s), when performed
29881    with meniscectomy (medial OR lateral, including any meniscal shaving) including debridement/shaving of articular cartilage (chondroplasty), same or separate compartment(s), when performed
29882    with meniscus repair (medial OR lateral)
29883    with meniscus repair (medial AND lateral)
Meniscectomy (29880, 29881) and meniscal repairs (29882, 29883) may be performed alone or with other services, and often are the primary service. Meniscectomy involves surgical removal of all or part of a torn meniscus, while 29882 and 29883 are used when the meniscal tear is repairable.
A key concept in reporting meniscectomy and meniscal repair is that of knee compartments. CPT®, AAOS, and Medicare all recognize three anatomic compartments in the knee (medial, lateral, and patellofemoral). CPT® definitions, GSD guidelines, and NCCI guidelines are based on whether meniscal or other procedures are performed in one or multiple compartments. In some cases, a second procedure may be reported if performed in a separate compartment; whereas, if performed in the same compartment as the primary procedure, it’s not separately reportable.
By definition, 29880 reports meniscectomy in both the medial and lateral compartments, while 29881 defines a meniscectomy in either the medial or lateral compartment. Since 2012, codes 29880 and 29881 have included debridement/shaving of articular cartilage (chondroplasty), whether it’s performed in the same or a separate compartment.
The meniscal repair codes also designate options for both medial and lateral compartments (29883) or for only one compartment (29882). The meniscal repair code definitions do not include chondroplasty, which may be separately reported when performed in a separate compartment.
29877 Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; debridement/shaving of articular cartilage (chondroplasty)
Under CPT® rules, arthroscopic chondroplasty in the medial, lateral, and/or patellofemoral compartment(s) may be reported once per surgical session with other arthroscopic procedures when performed in a separate compartment — excluding meniscectomy procedures 29880 and 29881. As such, report chondroplasty only when it’s the sole procedure performed in the separate compartment.
Likewise, the GSD guidelines state 29877 is separately reportable with other procedures when performed in a separate compartment where no other surgical procedure is performed, and when it’s not included in the primary code by definition (29880 and 29881 do not meet this requirement).
Based on CPT® and GSD guidelines, you may append modifier 59 to indicate chondroplasty was performed as the only procedure in a separate compartment (except as previously noted).
Medicare rules are different for chondroplasty reporting. Since 2003, Medicare has instructed providers to use HCPCS Level II code G0289 Arthroscopy, knee, surgical, for removal of loose body, foreign body, debridement/shaving of articular cartilage (chrondroplasty) at the time of other surgical knee arthroscopy in a different compartment of the same knee*, instead of 29877, to report chondroplasty when it’s performed in a separate compartment. G0289 was created for reporting on Medicare claims. It was not intended for use by non-Medicare payers, although some non-Medicare payers have adopted it. Although a “0” NCCI edit pairs 29877 and the meniscal repair codes, this does not mean chondroplasty is not reportable with meniscal repairs to CMS or any other payer. Instead, you’re instructed to use G0289 for Part B Medicare beneficiaries to report the service if the separate compartment criterion is met and no additional surgery is performed in that compartment.
*Chapter IV of the NCCI guidelines modifies the descriptor of G0289 slightly, as “Surgical knee arthroscopy for removal of loose body, foreign body, debridement/shaving of articular cartilage at the time of other surgical knee arthroscopy in a different compartment of the same knee.”
Because G0289’s definition says “at the time of other surgical knee arthroscopy,” if chondroplasty is the only procedure performed, 29877 is the appropriate code for all payers, including Medicare.
Warning! Do not use either 29877 or G0289 to report chondroplasty with meniscectomy 29880 or 29881 because the chondroplasty is inclusive to their definitions. Chondroplasty, whether reported as 29877 or G0289, may be separately reported with meniscal repair codes 29882 and 29883, when performed in a separate compartment, assuming another reportable service is not performed there.
Keep in mind Medicare has directed us to only use modifier 59 when a procedure-to-procedure edit exists between two codes (see sidebar Modifiers 59 and X {EPSU} Primer). There is no procedure-to-procedure edit between 29882 or 29883 and G0289.  It’s not correct to apply modifier 59 to Medicare claims with these codes. Medicare assumes that G0289 represents the arthroscopic removal of a loose body or foreign body in a different compartment. Modifier 59 may be applied when reporting 29877 to private payers to indicate the separate compartment rule is met.

Removal of Loose or Foreign Bodies

29874 Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; for removal of loose body or foreign body (eg, osteochondritis dissecans fragmentation, chondral fragmentation)
As is true when reporting chondroplasty, there are differences between CPT® and Medicare reporting requirements when reporting arthroscopic removal of loose or foreign bodies.
Although the CPT® definition does not specify as such, the GSD guidelines clarify that reporting removal of loose or foreign bodies through the arthroscopic sheath is included in the base procedure and that removal of loose or foreign bodies greater than 5 mm and/or through a separate incision is separately reportable. Under these criteria, for a non-Medicare patient, a physician could report loose or foreign body removal using 29874 with a primary service such as meniscectomy or meniscal repair (even from within the same compartment), and you would use modifier 59 to indicate the size or separate incision criteria are met.
For Medicare patients — because G0289 includes the reference “in a different compartment of the same knee” — do not report loose or foreign body removal performed in the same compartment as another procedure, even if the size and incision criteria are met. Report 29874 for a Medicare patient only when it’s the sole procedure performed.
Medicare reinforces its definition of G0289 though an NCCI guideline in chapter IV: “HCPCS code G0289 should not be reported for removal of a loose body or foreign body or debridement/shaving of articular cartilage from the same compartment as another knee arthroscopic procedure.” Report G0289 only if the separate compartment requirement is met in addition to the size or incision expectation.
Table 1 compares the reporting methods for meniscectomy and meniscal repairs with chondroplasty and loose/foreign body removal, separating CPT® and Medicare rules.
knees table 1knees-table-1
29875 Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; synovectomy, limited (eg, plica or shelf resection) (separate procedure)
Limited synovectomy is defined in CPT® as a “separate procedure.” As such, do not report 29875 with another arthroscopic procedure in the same knee. Report it when it’s the only arthroscopic procedure performed on that knee. Compartments are not recognized for the purpose of reporting this CPT® code.
29876 Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; synovectomy, major, 2 or more compartments (eg, medial or lateral)
Major synovectomy involves resection of pathologic synovial disease from two or more knee compartments. To report 29876, it’s not enough for the surgeon to simply “clean up” the joint while performing more extensive surgery. Rather, per “Coding Knee Arthroscopies” by Mary LeGrand (AAOS Now, January 2013), “To report both procedures, the surgeon should document the medical necessity and the performance of a ‘synovial resection’ for pathology — not just cleaning up loose synovium that might be fibrillating in the joint.” The same article provides detailed examples on this topic.
In other words, to report major synovectomy in addition to another arthroscopic knee procedure, documentation must establish pathologic synovial disease. Reporting of this service varies based on CPT® and Medicare rules:
According to CPT®, as long as pathologic synovial disease is present, you may consider 29876 with another arthroscopic knee procedure, even if it occurs in the same compartment — excluding procedures for removal of loose/foreign body or chondroplasty.
Medicare applies a second requirement through an NCCI guideline in Chapter IV. In addition to requiring medical necessity of pathologic synovial disease, 29876 is reported only if no other arthroscopic surgery is performed in the same compartment.

Lateral/Retinacular Release

29873 Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with lateral release
NCCI edits pair 29873 with 29874 and 29877 with a “0” modifier indicator because Medicare requires G0289 to describe either the chondroplasty or loose/foreign body removal when performed with 29873, and to meet the separate compartment criterion. Under CPT® rules, chondroplasty must be performed in a separate compartment to report 29873.

Lysis of Adhesions

29884 Arthroscopy, knee, surgical; with lysis of adhesions, with or without manipulation (separate procedure)
Because it’s a “separate procedure,” do not report arthroscopic lysis of adhesions with any other arthroscopic procedure in the same knee, whether for Medicare or non-Medicare claims.

CPT®, GSD, and NCCI Histories

The American Medical Association’s (AMA) CPT® is a set of codes, descriptions, and guidelines intended to define procedures and services. Since 1966, it has been the standard for reporting physician-performed services.
The AAOS developed and maintains a supplemental set of coding guidelines for its members. Introduced in 1991 and called the Complete Global Service Data for Orthopaedic Surgery (GSD), the guidelines provide detail regarding what is included in (or excluded from) every orthopaedic CPT® code. The GSD guidelines clarify details that may not be evident in the CPT® descriptions, but that were applied when the CPT® codes were developed.
The National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) is a program developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to prevent improper payment of procedures that should not be submitted together. NCCI was first implemented in 1996. NCCI includes a combination of narrative guidelines and code-specific, procedure-to-procedure edits. The edits indicate that two services are never paid together using a designator of “0” and that two services could be paid together if appropriate criteria are met using a designator of “1.” NCCI edits are not all inclusive; just because an edit is not present does not mean code sets may be reported together. There are examples in orthopaedics where an NCCI procedure-to-procedure edit exists between codes; several of these examples affect arthroscopic knee procedures. NCCI has also established narrative guidelines more restrictive than CPT® parameters affecting knee procedures.

Modifiers 59 and X {EPSU} Primer

As defined by CPT®, the criteria to use modifier 59 Distinct procedural service are:

Different session;

Different procedure or surgery;

Different site or organ system;

Separate incision/excision;

Separate lesion; or

Separate injury (or area of injury in extensive injuries) not ordinarily encountered or performed on the same day by the same individual.

When CPT® guidelines support reporting both services, modifier 59 may be appropriate to show requirements have been met.
CMS recognizes modifier 59 for Medicare claims, but has instructed providers to only use modifier 59 when there is an NCCI procedure-to-procedure edit between two codes, and only when no other more specific modifier can be used. For a detailed review of how CMS interprets modifier 59, refer to the NCCI guidelines, chapter I, section E. Based on these guidelines, physicians may be able to use the modifier for non-Medicare payers when they may not use it for Medicare claims.
In 2015, CPT® and CMS introduced the X {EPSU} modifiers, which can be used to describe specific circumstances where codes are reported together due to separate encounter (XE), separate provider (XP), separate structure (XS), and unusual non-overlapping service (XU) factors. Because the knee is a single structure, it’s not appropriate to use modifier XS with a second procedure in the ipsilateral knee. The concept of anatomic compartments in the knee, described elsewhere, do not qualify as separate structures. These modifiers are not used with another, more appropriate modifier (e.g., modifier 59).

Sarah Wiskerchen, MBA, CPC, is a senior practice management consultant with Chicago-based KarenZupko & Associates. She specializes in CPT® and ICD-10 orthopaedic coding education, reimbursement analysis, and process consulting. Wiskerchen works with orthopaedic; ear, nose, and throat; and neurosurgery practices, nationally. She is a member of the Oakbrook, Ill., local chapter.

No Responses to “Reinforce Knee Arthroscopy Coding”

  1. Rebecca Teece says:

    I am logged in and still not able to read this article. Is there perhaps a system glitch?

  2. Shari Pope says:

    I am having the same issue, I am logged in and cannot read the article.

  3. Shari Pope says:

    I am logged in, but I am not able to read the article.

  4. Liz Arpino says:

    is it ever appropriate to #1 rebill a claim because a cpt code was denied payment with 59 on all cpt codes ex.
    29881 and #2 up the dollar amt from the previous billing?
    I have a collector in my office doing this.

  5. karen webb says:

    can I bill a 29880 with a 29888?