Hold Strong When Shoulder Arthroscopy Weighs You Down
Here is coding guidance to lift the weight from your shoulders.The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) have opposing views on shoulder anatomy. AAOS recognizes the glenohumeral joint, the acromioclavicular (AC) joint, and the subacromial bursa as separate anatomic areas. CMS, by contrast, considers the shoulder to be a single anatomic region.
Understand the Differences and ChallengesGiven these differences, coding arthroscopic shoulder surgery for providers who follow AAOS guidelines can be challenging. For example: A surgeon performs a right, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a distal claviculectomy, acromioplasty, and debridement of the labrum. A subacromial decompression is performed, with 1 cm removed from the distal clavicle. Your first instinct may be to report CPT® 29827-RT Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; with rotator cuff repair-Right side, 29824-RT Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; distal claviculectomy including distal articular surface (Mumford procedure), +29826-RT Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; decompression of subacromial space with partial acromioplasty, with coracoacromial ligament (ie, arch) release, when performed (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure), and 29822-RT-59 Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; debridement, limited-Distinct procedural service. The problem with this coding is that 29822 bundles into 29827 and 29824, per National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits; and because this is the same shoulder, it’s inappropriate use a modifier to bypass the bundling edit.
Distal ClaviculectomyWhen determining whether the charges support 29824, you must review the records to determine:
- Was the service performed on the shoulder arthroscopically?
- Was the service performed on the distal clavicle?
- Was approximately 1 cm removed?
Subacromial Decompression with Partial AcromioplastyCPT® 29826 requires both a subacromial decompression and a partial acromioplasty. If acromioplasty is not performed, report only a debridement. Keep in mind that 29826 is an add-on code requiring a primary procedure. When coding the acromioplasty, look for discussion about the morphology (specifically type I, II, or III) in the operative notes. This determines if the acromion is flat, curved, or hooked. Returning to the AC joint: Was the creation of the 1 cm space in the AC joint due to a distal claviculectomy, acromioplasty, or both? If the bur was used to reshape the acromion by removing osteophytes or excess bone, this could be a form of debridement. If the acromioplasty is the only service performed, report a debridement (29822 or 29823). If acromioplasty is performed with distal claviculectomy, it’s possible the two procedures created the 1 cm space. In this situation, it may be appropriate to report 29824 or 29826, but not both. Encourage providers to describe the acromioplasty with morphology and the distal claviculectomy of approximately 1 cm separately, rather than to indicate the creation of a 1 cm space at the AC joint. This will reduce allegations of upcoding debridement, billing for services not rendered, or other false claim allegations. Example: If a 1 cm space is created by removing 7 mm from the distal clavicle and 3 mm from the acromion, this is a debridement (29822) because the documentation does not meet the minimum requirements for the distal claviculectomy or the acromioplasty. If the 3 mm removed from the acromion is a true acromioplasty — achieved by converting the acromion to a type I morphology with a subacromial decompression — proper coding is 29822 and 29826. The 7 mm does not meet the requirements of the claviculectomy. Documentation must support both services.
Rotator Cuff SurgeryThere are three possible codes for open rotator cuff surgery, depending on whether it’s an acute or chronic repair, or if it’s a reconstruction. CPT® 29827 is the only code for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. If performing a revision or a reconstruction, modifier 22 Unusual procedural service may be used to indicate the extensive work involved in the revision or reconstruction. Check with your payer, however, as they may require a different code for the arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction (e.g., 29999 Unlisted procedure, arthroscopy).
DebridementDebridement is reported as either limited (29822) or extensive (29823). To report the extensive debridement, documentation must indicate anterior and posterior sites, multiple sites (usually three or more), and/or abrasion chondroplasty. In comparison, limited debridement involves only a couple of sites. Example: A provider performs a subacromial decompression, biceps tenotomy, and debridement of the anterior labrum. Proper coding is 29823. If the provider only performs two of the three procedures, proper coding is 29822.
SLAP RepairsProviders must document the type of superior labrum from anterior to posterior (SLAP) to determine the correct code. There are four types of SLAP: Type I is always 29822, which is a debridement. Type III is either a debridement under 29822 or a SLAP repair under 29807 Arthroscopy, shoulder, surgical; repair of SLAP lesion. Base your coding on the documentation. If the provider documents a type III repair, report 29807. If debridement is documented, report 29822. Type II and IV are coded 29807. Documentation must be specific to the type and procedure performed to determine proper coding.
Unlisted ArthroscopyCPT® 29999 is often incorrectly reported for coracoid decompression, biceps tenotomy, and microfracturing. The coracoid is connected to the acromion by the coracoacromial ligament. Release of the coracoacromial ligament is an inclusive component of 29826. The procedure does not require the release to be proximal to either the acromion or the coracoids; and because the code includes the coracoacromial ligament, it includes the coracoid process. Subacromial decompression without acromioplasty is considered debridement. Coracoid decompression is, likewise, a form of debridement. Coracoid decompression is included in 29826 when acromioplasty is performed; otherwise, it is considered debridement under 29822 or 29823, depending on the extent of the debridement. Biceps tenotomy (the removal of damaged tissue to promote healing) also meets the definition of debridement (29822 or 29823). The release of the biceps tendon allows the inflamed tissue to leave the shoulder joint and fall into the upper arm. Microfracturing is performed by drilling small holes (2-3 mm deep) into the bone to promote healing of healthy bone. Because anything less than 8 mm of a distal claviculectomy is considered debridement, 2-3 mm of microfracturing meets the definition of debridement for 29822 or 29823 (depending on the extent of the debridement).
NCCI Doesn’t Allow Modifiers for Same-Shoulder EditsUnder the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits used by Medicare, Medicaid, some workers’ compensation payers, and some other commercial health payers, providers may never use an NCCI modifier, such as 59 Distinct procedural service, XE Separate encounter, XP Separate practitioner, XS Separate structure, or XU Unusual non-overlapping service to bypass the procedure-to-procedure edits in place for should surgery, unless the service is performed on the opposite shoulder. NCCI is required for use by Medicaid per the Affordable Care Act, and it has been adopted by 20 states for workers’ compensation. Many commercial carriers have also adopted NCCI, sometimes with modifications to reflect payer-specific medical policies and reimbursement methodologies.
Check Bundling, DocumentationMany arthroscopic shoulder surgeries are reported as debridement with 29822 or 29823; however, when performed with another arthroscopic shoulder procedure on the same shoulder, the debridement is bundled into the primary surgical code(s) (if subjected to NCCI edits). Bottom line: Coders and providers must be aware of the documentation requirements for proper coding of shoulder procedures.
Michael Strong, MSHCA, MBA, CPC, CEMC, is the bill review technical specialist at SFM Mutual Insurance Company. He is a former senior fraud investigator with years of experience performing investigations into fraud and abuse. Strong also is a former EMT-B and college professor of health law and communications. He is a member of the St. Paul, Minn., local chapter, and can be contacted at email@example.com. Resources: AAOS “April 2004 Bulletin”