Top Miscoded HCCs
- By Guest Contributor
- In Coding
- February 1, 2022
- Comments Off on Top Miscoded HCCs
Failing to catch these common diagnosis errors can be costly for everyone involved.
We all understand the importance of abstracting information from provider documentation and accurately applying ICD-10-CM codes. These codes paint the overall clinical picture of the patient encounter, as well as the severity of illness in the patient. When it comes to risk adjustment, capturing accurate and complete diagnoses is key to forecasting the risk and resources needed for each patient. To boost diagnosis coding accuracy, let’s review some of the most miscoded hierarchal condition categories (HCCs). Many of these coding errors are on the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG’s) list for review.
History of Cerebral Infarction vs. Cerebral Infarction With Residual Deficits
A commonly miscoded HCC is related to stroke. Errors seen include coding history of cerebral infarction (stroke) versus cerebral infarction with residual deficits and coding the stroke as current when it is not. In an outpatient setting, it is unlikely that a patient would be having a definitive stroke such that the provider can accurately document and code “stroke;” these conditions are diagnosed in the hospital after thorough examination and testing. However, the OIG review has found numerous examples of current stroke coded on outpatient encounters in error.
Patients with a history of stroke may present with residual deficits. On the outpatient side, this is what we would expect to see coded. Reviewing the documentation carefully to capture these conditions accurately is essential. ICD-10-CM code Z86.73 Personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction without residual deficits does not have an associated HCC. However, many of the residual deficits of a cerebral infarction have HCCs.
For example: A provider’s documentation states a patient has a history of stroke. In the physical exam, the provider indicates the patient has right hemiplegia due to a previous stroke. In this case, it would be inappropriate to code Z86.73. Instead, you would code I69.351 Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side to capture the current sequela of the stroke.
Of note, per ICD-10-CM coding guideline I.C.9.d.1, category I69, Sequela of cerebrovascular disease, states that codes from this category:
… that specify sequela for hemiplegia, hemiparesis and monoplegia must identify whether the dominant or nondominant side is affected. Should the affected side be documented, but not specified as dominant or nondominant, and the classification system does not indicate a default, code selection is as follows:
- For ambidextrous patients, the default should be dominant.
- If the left side is affected, the default is non-dominant.
- If the right side is affected, the default is dominant.
Sequela of cerebral infarction codes include (not an all-inclusive list):
I69.334 (HCC) Monoplegia of upper limb following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side
I69.341 (HCC) Monoplegia of lower limb following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side
I69.351 (HCC) Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side
I69.354 (HCC) Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side
Old Myocardial Infarction vs. Acute Myocardial Infarction
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is often miscoded in the context of when it occurred. According to the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting, codes from category I21, Acute myocardial infarction, may continue to be reported for encounters occurring while the myocardial infarction is equal to, or less than, four weeks old, and the diagnosis meets the definition for reporting additional diagnoses.
It’s important to review provider documentation to determine when the myocardial infarction occurred. Providers should be reminded and encouraged to report the date of the AMI as part of the clinical documentation, as it is relevant to complete documentation as well as correct coding. Typically, documentation of the hospitalization for the AMI can provide a timeline for reference when coding; however, remember that each medical record must stand on its own in an audit.
Coding I25.2 Old myocardial infarction would be inappropriate if provider documentation indicates the patient was diagnosed within the four-week period. After the four-week period, if the patient is continuing to need care or treatment, it is inappropriate to continue to code the AMI as current. It is also incorrect to code for the AMI as resolved or old if the patient is continuing to require care. Code Z48.812 Encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system would be the appropriate coding for a patient continuing to be treated for a myocardial infarction beyond the first 28 days.
In addition to I25.2, myocardial infarction codes include (not an all-inclusive list):
I21.01 (HCC) ST elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarction involving left main coronary artery
I21.11 (HCC) ST elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarction involving right coronary artery
I21.3 (HCC) ST elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarction of unspecified site
I21.4 (HCC) Non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction
I21.A1 (HCC) Myocardial infarction type 2
Acute/Chronic Deep Vein Thrombosis vs. History of Deep Vein Thrombosis
When coding for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) review provider documentation carefully to ensure it supports coding acute or chronic DVT. Don’t assume the patient has a current acute or chronic DVT just because they are on anticoagulants or have an embolism protection device, such as an inferior vena cava filter, in place. If the DVT has resolved, report Z86.718 Personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism. A diagnosis for current DVT should only be reported when the condition is active and present.
DVT codes include (not an all-inclusive list):
I82.401 (HCC) Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity
I82.432 (HCC) Acute embolism and thrombosis of left popliteal vein
I82.521 (HCC) Chronic embolism and thrombosis of right iliac vein
I82.542 (HCC) Chronic embolism and thrombosis of left tibial vein
Major Depressive Disorder
Depressive disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) and major depression NOS do not have associated HCCs. Whether it’s a lack of clear documentation from the provider or the coder missing key details in the record, this diagnosis category often misses the mark for coding accuracy and capturing HCCs. Seeking higher specificity from your provider through a proper query process and utilizing the details in the record to accurately report the specific type of major depressive disorder is key.
Major depressive disorder can exhibit many forms, from single or recurrent episodes to various severities, including mild, moderate, severe without psychotic features, and severe with psychotic features. Capturing the appropriate patient condition is vital to properly forecasting the financial risk patients with these diagnoses pose.
Major depressive disorder codes include (not an all-inclusive list):
F32.0 (HCC) Major depressive disorder, single episode, mild
F32.2 (HCC) Major depressive disorder, single episode, severe without psychotic features
F33.1 (HCC) Major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate
F33.3 (HCC) Major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms
F33.42 (HCC) Major depressive disorder, recurrent, in full remission
Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Heart Disease
Hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and heart disease are some of the most miscoded conditions in ICD-10-CM. With the guideline changes over the years, it has been a challenge for coders to understand exactly which conditions have a presumed causal relationship. According to ICD-10-CM guideline I.C.9.a, “The classification presumes a causal relationship between hypertension and heart involvement and between hypertension and kidney involvement, as the two conditions are linked by the term ‘with’ in the Alphabetic Index.” What does this mean? If a patient presents with hypertension, chronic diastolic heart failure, and stage 3 CKD, as coders, we can presume that the heart disease and kidney disease are due to hypertension, and code: I13.0 Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease, I50.32 Chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and N18.30 Chronic kidney disease, stage 3 unspecified.
The exception to this rule is when the provider specifically documents another cause to one of these conditions. For example, the same patient presents with hypertension, chronic diastolic heart failure, and stage 3 CKD. However, stage 3 CKD is documented as “due to type 2 diabetes.” Since the provider documented a known cause of stage 3 CKD (type 2 diabetes), you would not presume a relationship between hypertension and CKD. This changes the final code selection, leading you to code I11.0 Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, I50.32, E11.22 Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and N18.30.
In addition to I11.0 and I13.0, hypertension combination codes include (not an all-inclusive list):
I11.9 Hypertensive heart disease without heart failure
I12.0 (HHC) Hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 5 chronic kidney disease or end stage renal disease
I12.9 Hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease
Diabetes With Complications
Another area of coding that is often miscoded is complications of diabetes. When it comes to ICD-10-CM codes for diabetes, coders should have a deep understanding of the coding convention from guideline I.A.15 “With.” According to the ICD-10-CM coding conventions, the word “with” or “in” should be interpreted to mean “associated with” or “due to” when it appears in a code title, the Alphabetic Index, or an instructional note in the Tabular List.
There are many combination codes to consider when coding for diabetes complications. For example, in the Alphabetic Index under “Diabetes with,” there are many conditions that are considered “due to” diabetes when both conditions are present and provider documentation does not indicate a specific cause (for example, E11.43 Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic (poly)neuropathy). When both type 2 diabetes and gastroparesis are documented in the record, a diabetes complication code is required. Many times, these conditions are overlooked and coded separately.
There is one exception to the “with” rule per AHA Coding Clinic 2018 Vol. 5, No. 2, which states: “The ‘with’ guideline does not apply to ‘not elsewhere classified (NEC)’ index entries that cover broad categories of conditions. Specific conditions must be linked by the terms ‘with,’ ‘due to,’ or ‘associated with.'” The guidance further specifies that for diabetic conditions that would be coded as NEC codes, coding professionals are not to assume a causal relationship, and the provider must be clear in stating the relationship.
Diabetes combination codes include (not an all-inclusive list):
E10.31 (HCC) Type 1 diabetes mellitus with unspecified diabetic retinopathy
E10.40 (HCC) Type 1 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified
E11.22 (HCC) Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease
E11.311 (HCC) Type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified diabetic retinopathy with macular edema
E11.621 (HCC) Type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer
As you can see, it’s important to review the complete record and understand the ICD-10-CM guidelines to accurately code conditions that are present in each patient. Sometimes the small details may alter the coding significantly. Reviewing coding guidelines annually and communicating with providers about clear documentation is vital.
Authors: AAPC’s Documentation Advisory Committee:
Jamie Fear, CPC
Kelly Shew, RHIA, CPC, CPCO, CDEO, CPB, CRC, AAPC Approved Instructor
Chelsea Kemp, RHIT, CCS, COC, CDEO, CPMA, CRC, CCC, CEDC, CGIC, AAPC Approved Instructor
Melissa Kirshner, MPH, CPC, CDEO, CRC, CFPC, AAPC Approved Instructor, AAPC Fellow
- Billing a PA’s Services Incident to a Physician’s - May 1, 2023
- Top 4 Compliance Policies and Procedures - May 1, 2023
- Get the FAQs About Split/Shared Visits - November 1, 2022