Primary Care Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Location Matters When Coding Ultrasound Service

Question: Our FP took a biopsy using ultrasound to guide needle placement in the office (he owns the equipment). Can we report the ultrasound separately? Maine Subscriber Answer: Since he conducted the test in the office with his own ultrasound equipment, you should report the service separately. You-ll code these claims with the following codes: - 10022 (Fine needle aspiration; with imaging guidance) for the biopsy - 76942 (Ultrasonic guidance for needle placement, imaging supervision and interpretation) for the ultrasound. However, when the FP performs the same procedure at the hospital, the coding will change. If the FP provided the ultrasonic guidance with interpretation and performed the biopsy in the hospital, you would code 10022 and 76942 with modifier 26 (Professional component) appended to show that you are billing only for the FP's work, not the ultrasound equipment used. If someone on the hospital staff (a radiologist, etc.) provided the ultrasound and the FP only performed the biopsy, you would only report 10022 for the encounter.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.