Wiki 10 point review of systems

Community Wiki

This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been on AAPC for 30 days and have made 5 posts. Learn More
C
10 point review of systems

No. The physician must report the results of the points.

fpaisley

New
Messages
5
Best answers
0
our physicians use this statement for ROV:
"10 point review of systems is otherwise negative except as mentioned above."

Is this sufficient for a COMPLETE review of systems?
 

ajs

True Blue
Local Chapter Officer
Messages
1,086
Location
Tacoma, WA
Best answers
0
our physicians use this statement for ROV:
"10 point review of systems is otherwise negative except as mentioned above."

Is this sufficient for a COMPLETE review of systems?
I don't believe that is enough to constitute a complete review of systems. Each system still needs to be referenced if they are negative and a note to that effect. The "10 point review of systems" leaves a lot up to interpretation vs having a specific note for the relevant systems.
 

mdoyle53

Guest
Messages
154
Location
Concord, NC or Rochester, NY
Best answers
0
I have the physicians document the systems that are +/-'ly impacted and then record - all other systems negative (which is allowed by 95 standards). They need to review the systems that could be impacted for the reason of the visit.
 

RebeccaWoodward*

True Blue
Messages
3,126
Location
North Carolina
Best answers
0
our physicians use this statement for ROV:
"10 point review of systems is otherwise negative except as mentioned above."

Is this sufficient for a COMPLETE review of systems?
No...

"A complete ROS inquires about the system(s) directly related to the problem(s) identified in the HPI plus all additional body systems.

!DG: At least ten organ systems must be reviewed. Those systems with positive or pertinent negative responses must be individually documented. For the remaining systems, a notation indicating all other systems are negative is permissible. In the absence of such a notation, at least ten systems must be individually documented."

https://www.cms.gov/MLNEdWebGuide/25_EMDOC.asp
 

MikeEnos

Expert
Messages
283
Location
Warwick, RI
Best answers
0
The reason why that phrase may not be acceptable is because there is so much variation between providers of different specialties regarding what systems are reviewed in a '10-point' ROS. CMS polled doctors across the country and found that different providers do different system reviews. So for an example, an ENT doctor in Boston may review 8 organ systems, while a OB/GYN in California may review 6 different ones, and an Oncologist in Texas may review 12. In that example, the ENT may say 'The remainder of the ROS was negative' but that does not earn them credit for a 'complete' ROS, because they only reviewed 8 and a 'complete' ROS is defined as 10+ systems.

The best way to make sure that you get credit for a complete ROS is to use the word 'all' such as the phrases:
"Patient has had some coughing and wheezing, no fever, no nausea, no vision changes. All other systems are negative."
"Patient has limited range of motion in the knee, all other systems are reviewed and negative."

Notice how those phrases both make it clear that ALL other systems are negative, while phrases like these leave some room for uncertainty:
"Nausea and vomiting. Other systems negative." (how many other systems?)
"A 10-point ROS was negative." (what 10 points? Can we be sure they didn't count Cardiovascular 2 or even 3 times?)
"No chest pain or palpitations, no shortness of breath. ROS Otherwise negative." (We don't know what other systems were reviewed)
"No fevers, chills, headaches, vision or hearing changes. Remainder of ROS is negative." (We can't be sure how many other systems were reviewed.)
"Occasional headaches. Heartburn nightly. Otherwise no complaints." (This does not indicate what other systems were reviewed.)

Those are some common examples that I see all the time, and I usually flag them to let the providers know that Medicare won't accept that as a complete ROS. For a new office patient, that could hold back the whole level of the code (since a level 4 or 5 new patient requires a Comprehensive level of history.)

I hope that answers your question.
 

remarti5210

New
Local Chapter Officer
Messages
1
Best answers
0
Ros

"All systems were reviewed and no abnormalities were found"
Is this exceptable even though they do not state All systems are NEGATIVE?
 

mlbaker1974

Networker
Messages
43
Location
Moore Oklahoma
Best answers
0
"All systems were reviewed and no abnormalities were found"
Is this exceptable even though they do not state All systems are NEGATIVE?
I wouldn't accept this statement if all systems were reviewed and no abnormalities found then why did the patient come in? Auditors want to see what was reviewed especially if it is pertinent to the reason the patient came in. If your provider uses an EMR they can adjust the template to make the ROS easier for the provider to capture what he did, auditors don't necessarily like the templated information but we have to count it. Mike also has some very good advice in his post.
 
Last edited:
Top