• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
  • We're introducing new features and a new look to make the forums easier to use and more valuable to you. See what's new and let us know what you think!

a fib vs. chronic a fib


Best answers
hi, i am so curious as to why i read medical records that document chronic atrial fibrillation when there is no code for this, all atrial fibrillations seem to fall under 427.31.. isn't a fib, a fib? increased risk for stroke regardless, right? someone please either link or differentiate a fib vs. chronic a fib and why there is no icd-9 diagnosis code for the chronic one. thank you!


True Blue
Best answers
There are not enough code numbers available in ICD-9 for every dx out there. That is why the rest of the world, including us in the near future, uses ICD-10 or ICD-11.

There are a lot of dx options not represented in ICD-9, controlled or uncontrolled HTN is a great example.

Diagnosis are not driven by coding books, coding books are driven by diagnosis, the books are just not as complete as we would like for them to be or even really need them to be.

It is very frustrating when they tell us we have to code to the highest level of specificity but the book doesn't allow us to really do that in many cases.

Laura, CPC, CEMC